Since the very day I began studying this thriving Cryptocurrency Market through Technical Charts Analysis, I have begun to see things, trends and patterns more precisely as time wanes even further and closer to the Year 2020. And one of those patterns which stands out significantly are the interesting similarities between Bitcoin and BitConnect within the same timeline. BitConnect is an open source, peer-to-peer, community driven decentralized cryptocurrency that allows people to store and invest their wealth in a non-government controlled currency, and even earning a substantial interest on investment.
BitConnect helps its users to create more Bitcoin by lending out its cryptocurrency tokens to a Bitcoin Trading Web Bot (An Algorithmic Artificial Intelligence Software) that trades Bitcoin. This BitConnect Crypto is listed as one of the Top 20 Cryptos according to CoinMarketCap.com. The more the volatility, the better the payout. Essentially, this trading bot rides the wave of the Bitcoin Price-Point through the fluctuations of Market Swings where Bitcoin is automatically sold on “The Highs” and bought on “The Lows”. This is repeatedly done by its program’s Artificial Intelligence Software several thousand times a day.
As a result, as Bitcoin’s value and price-point increase, so does BitConnect’s value. They possess a considerable amount of correlation with one another, financially, numerically, socially, and perhaps even through scrutiny as well.
In continuing on with my analysis, I have found that there are simply way to many inter-related factors which help to support my hypothesis that the very people or groups of people involved with the development and creation of Bitcoin is also greatly linked to the creation of the BitConnect-Lending Platform. I believe that this conclusion on my part is highly controversial but the intention here is to invoke conversation and freedom of thought, not controversy. Although, this will most certainly be the case. The subject matter of Satashi Nakamoto always seems to summon a heightened level of controversy and conspiracy. The creators for both platforms are indeed anonymous. This is no secret. And both platforms within themselves have been negatively deemed and critically considered as very controversial issues indeed to any conversation when discussed. CLICK THE FOLLOWING IMAGE TO VIEW SUPPORTING VIDEO EVIDENCE…
As I have made mention on several occasions to many of my associates concerning the supposed creator of Bitcoin, the actual entity associated with its development cannot be linked towards the likes of only one individual, but rather must be more logically considered to be derived from the makings of a team of developers instead. Surprisingly enough (on BitConnect’s website), the creator of Bitcoin was defined as a pseudonymous entity of a people or group of people. This is very interesting in a sense. For when making comparisons, most point to one single individual. But to look deeper into the linguistics of how Satoshi Nakamoto was defined (on BitConnects’ website) as a pseudonymous entity of a group of people or institution, rather than one single developer, is revealing to a certain extent. But, how coincidental is that to even consider? To make such a bold controversial declaration can be led to be either questionable for debate and inquiry, or highly cryptic in nature which points to at least a little certain truth. Could it be that the makers behind BitConnect are intentionally leaving breadcrumbs, here and there, concerning a smaller-portioned size of the actual Road Map to the larger-sized portrait of this Bitcoin phenomen?
Both have received the same increasing sense of negative critical reaction from the more SKEPTICAL general public during the beginning phases of their developmental rise. It is a reaction of heavy scrutiny, of ridicule, mockery and of the most common verbal intonation: IT’S A PONZI SCHEME! IT’S A SCAM! IT’S A MANIPULATIVE TRAP TO TAKE YOUR MONEY! In the same notion, it also acts a vehicle similar to how the word “Conspiracy Theory” plays itself well as a tool to ward off any organizational entity, movement or individual threat from the proverbial Status Quo – The Establishment.
By no means am I a marketing genius nor have I been formally educated in Marketing Theory or practice, but from the last 3 years of enthusiastically studying internet marketing as a novice, I have discovered that such broadcasted intonations such as PONZI SCHEME, SCAM & “YOUR A CONSPIRACY THEORIST” are mere inverse marketing tools which plays upon Consumer Subconsciousness. To be plain and direct, marketing is essentially the wooing and the manipulation of the consumer mind. And since the Western World was trained to thrive within a Consumer economy, we as a society (within this Capitalistic matrix) are indeed made mass Consumers of whatever is produced to us to take our money to whatever regard in such speedier deliveries. CLICK THE FOLLOWING IMAGE TO VIEW SUPPORTING VIDEO EVIDENCE…
To further support BitConnect’s identical DNA blueprint and makeup, the photographic picture from both Bitcoin and BitConnect fluctuations possess the same exact AMAZING mirror image of each other in price-action as analyzed within the charts on CoinMarketCap.com – From every single incline and decline they mimic each other precisely within the charts, as if they were meant to be programmed to be exact twin images of each other in Market behavior and strength. Just remember, the charts do not lie. Only the interpretation of such charts can differ with due respect. No other cryptocurrency within the market replicates Bitcoin’s in such the same and exacting way.
Even the linguistics within the name “BitConnect” denote a strong correlationship with Bitcoin. The “Bit” within BITCONNECT is highly indicative of BITCOIN. Thus, within the name, the specific nature of this Cryptocurrency (within Bitconnect) is plainly indicating that it is connecting to Bitcoin
BITCOIN has been seen and analyzed as an enthusiastic disruption within the ranks against the traditional centralized banking system. In the same notion, BITCONNECT has also been disruptive to the World of Cryptocurrency within its own particular niche. The developers and promoters of all the other Cryptocurrencies scoff at the very sound of this “Crypto” when BitConnect is even mentioned in conversation. They fear the very existence of BitConnect. And thus the question is this: WHY DO THEY FIND BITCONNECT SO THREATENING?
Just when Bitcoin started to truly take flight in the beginning of 2017 in mid-January, the BitConnect Web Wallet was made available to the general public during the beginning of the 1st quarter 2017 between 1/20/2017-1/30/2017. Just remember that this became to be so (a year later) after Bitcoin began to make surprising but interesting moves in price action from $200 in mid-2015 to over $900 by the end of 2016. Now have you know, BitConnect’s ICO campaign ran from November 2015 to December 2016. Does it also seem rather coincidental to note that this massive run-up in price action for Bitcoin occurred during the very beginning stages of BitConnect development.
This is exactly the very period of time when Bitcoin began to launch from its dormancy as a $200 Cryptocurrency back in 2015. Could it be that BITCONNECT was being used as the actual interconnected third-party tool or device to launch BITCOIN to now what it is today, a thriving $7900 Cryptocurrency. Mind you, the name of BITCONNECT is Bit-Connect, interpreted as “Bitcoin-Connect” -Connecting Bitcoin back to the Mainstream Alt-Coin Cryptocurrency Market. They almost exist synergistically with one another where each individual platform, from Bitcoin to BitConnect, consciously knows its place as programmed specifically within its algorithm. To me, all of this has been integrated intentionally within the blueprint or road map to what the Bitcoin Phenomenon is all about – very ingenious to say the least!
To me, BitConnect was a test and when the results had came in as to showing how valuable and lucrative this platform has become to be in only less than a year, this is when other lending platforms had surprisingly been birthed into existence during a time when Bitcoin needed it the most. These other so-called copycat lending platforms which actually replicate the DNA of BitConnect in infrastructure consist of the following: USI Tech, Hextra Coin, Falcon Coin, Davor Coin, Ucoin Cash, Regal Crypto Xchanger, Idea Coin and many many more which will further help to utilize the use and distribution of Bitcoin throughout the entirety within the growing and thriving marketplace of Cryptocurrency, similar to FOREX. Such new and up-and-comimg cryptocurrency programs will increase the worth of Bitcoin as a storage of value through the long haul. CLICK THE FOLLOWING IMAGE TO VIEW SUPPORTING VIDEO EVIDENCE…
Once more as previously mentioned, the development of these “BitConnect-Copy-Cryptos” have arisen in popularity during a time when another entity had proven itself to be a potential threat to the Bitcoin Revolution: BITCOIN CASH! Surprisingly enough, on Saturday 11/11/2017, BitConnect broadcasted on their website that Bitcoin Cash (Bitcoin’s rival) would no longer be supported as a form of payment. Now, funny to say (too as well) that during this specific weekend was when Bitcoin Cash had begun to spike up in price-point caused by the huge wave of volume of investments within this space coming from the Eastern Asian Markets after the historic cancellation of the SegWit2x Hard Fork, especially from South Korea who is most certainly one of the strongest proponents for this Cryptocurrency. It’s price action has shown within the market to portray an inverse relationship to Bitcoin’s. As Bitcoin Cash rose significantly in price, Bitcoin inversely dropped in value simultaneously.
Bitcoin Cash, for those who are unaware, is a cryptocurrency headed by Roger Ver, one of the most controversial of early adopters to Bitcoin and a trailblazer investor of Bitcoin Start-Up Businesses. He was formerly an American Citizen and currently now lives in Japan. So, essentially, it is of no wonder why Roger possesses such an influential presence in East Asia. Once more, November 11th occurred as the result when the highly-anticipated scheduled SegWit2x Hard Fork was cancelled. Although many investors found this to be an opportunity for great profitable gains, the majority of the community within the Cryptocurrency space did not support this split. Regardless, the developers and the supporters for Bitcoin Cash saw this as the opportunity and (quite possibly) an attempt to take over Bitcoin as the King of Cryptocurrency Kings. Fortunately enough, it was a Failed Crypto-Coupe attempt.
The community and the world fearfully witnessed right before their very own eyes quite potentially the hostile takeover of Bitcoin. To the popular media, this was referred to as the FAILED FLIPPENING OR CASHENING OF BITCOIN. Of course, this did not happen. The reason why this dialogue was brought forth to support my claim is that the very act of BitConnect in actively shutting down its doors to Bitcoin Cash shows to the Financial World that their particular loyalties and to that of their specified allegiance belonged to the original: Bitcoin Classic. Once more, BitConnect only thrives when Bitcoin Classic thrives. And it will only continue to be sustainable just as long as Bitcoin exists. Once more, they work intrinsically together hand-in-hand. SegWit2x’s and Bitcoin Cash’s “failed hostile take-over attempts” proves to the world and even to its skeptics that Bitcoin is most certainly DIGITAL GOLD. This test allowed for the world to truly realize that Bitcoin is highly resilient. And wherever Bitcoin goes in victory, BitConnect follows with enthusiastic strength. Does this tell you a little something about the nature of BitConnect from the evidence I’ve provided for you, if made true and valid? CLICK THE FOLLOWING IMAGE TO VIEW SUPPORTING VIDEO EVIDENCE…
Furthermore in the realms of the more prophetic in algorithmic nature, Clif High has made the following anticipations within the next few years to come concerning Bitconnect. But before we investigate deeper into his findings, I would like to make mention that Clif High is the creator of the Web Bot Project. The Web Bot Project is an internet bot computer program which supports a variety of claims which predicts future events by tracking key words entered in the internet. It was developed in 1997, originally to predict stock market futures and financial trends. But rather it dove further outside of the arena from what it was originally intended. It predicted SIGNIFICANT WORLD EVENTS like September 11th. His findings towards the sustainability of BitConnect within the next few years to come surprisingly but reassuringly go against many of the speculative and unsupported claims by a growing number of skeptics:
“Specialty coins, such as BitConnect, do show a bit more easily in the data sets as there is usually a specific linguistic hook that we can use to extract data on them. BitConnect as a trading coin is one of these due to its focus on ‘Linux’ – the operating system. The data sets have the BitConnect as the trading coin rising in relative percentage value as it will find that a new niche develops in the ‘deep geek’ world of ‘Linux’. This connection is indicated to allow BitConnect to port over to the Internet of Things and into the ‘Distrubuted Devices’ World of ‘miniLinux OS powered smart devices’. There are long-term data sets for BitConnect. Note that the claim of ‘scam claim’ on BitConnect is due to its use, and manipulation by scammers, not any inherent infrastructure design towards that end at least as to what shows up within the data sets. It still shows long-term. Not a screaming performer, but does have the legs to survive hyperinflation.” -Clif High
Personally, on my own end, I think, believe and feel that BitConnect is a legitimate platform as I have invested a significant share into it. I wouldn’t have invested greatly into it without doing my own research. Doing so, carries a greatened deal of risk. BitConnect performs exactly as it promises. As far as to the frequently-asked question to BitConnect’s long-term sustainability, I do believe that this platform possesses enough unrevealed fire-power that it will indeed stand the test of time, just as long as Bitcoin reigns true and supreme within the Cryptocurrency World of things. And if my theory proves correct and valid, then there is nothing to worry about. Many of the truly rooted scammers involved who enthusiastically and frequently attempt to derail the Bitcoin name and brand are essentially the very people of an organizational entity who are attempting to do the same for BitConnect. And as time further waxes and wanes, we (as the general public) along with the skeptics of Bitcoin and BitConnect will undoubtedly discover the fact that anything (associated with the progressive support and in the healthier functionality of both of these cryptocurrencies) will benefit tremendously throughout the test of time. Ladies and Gentlemen, we are witnessing right before our very own eyes the product of pure genius. For those who are new to this cryptocurrency space (well) Welcome to the NEW Financial Revolution!
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Aramu Muru is a Registered Nurse, specializing in Behavioral Health and Substance Abuse Recovery, and is a proud Veteran of the United States Air Force (Operation Desert Storm/Desert Shield). Aramu is also a podcaster, an author, an alternative thinker, a controversial theorist, prolific writer, blogger, an ancient archeology and cryptocurrency enthusiast, and the executive producer and founder of one of the most highly-esteemed podcast radio networks on planet earth today!