REVEALING THE NAME OF MASHAYKH FROM THE “SQUARE SCRIPT” HEATHEN-CONVERT POINT OF VIEW written by Ayala Nunez (Ya’oh-al Ban Napthalay)

Many times throughout much of my written work, you (the reader) will notice that I will refer to the Messiah as either Yahushua, Yahushua Ha’Maschiach, Ha’Maschiach (Messiah), or the Messiah. And the reason for why I will not refer to the Messiah as Jesus, Yeshua, or any one of the most trending and also one of the youngest versions of Yahushua Ha’Maschiach, which is “Yahusha”, is because all of these supposed gentile-influenced translations of the Messiah are false, aside from his true name “Yahushua Ha’Maschiach” (יהושוע). Additionally, this controversial research will, not only reveal the legitimacy of the true name of Ha’Maschiach, but it will also expose the true nature of the False Apostle Paul (Sha’ul), Paul’s apostasy, and the true meaning behind his name.

To begin with, the purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the Messiah’s original name never was “Jesus”, as the original is more authentic and true than any watered-down translation, for the name “Jesus” was essentially an invention of man, traditionalized and manufactured by the likes of Gentile institutions, like the Greeks who Hellenized the true name of the Messiah, Yahushua (יהושוע), in order to cater to more of their paganistic traditions when the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) was transliterated into their Greek Septuagint, in 250 BC. And the one piece of evidence which substantiates this argument is that, originally, the “J” sound in the Hebrew alphabet/language was nonexistent. The letter “J” and the sound of the letter “J” did not enter into the English language until about 500 years ago, or so. In fact, the letter “J” is surprisingly enough not found in the original 1611 King James Version of the Bible. In the 1611 version of the KJV, “Iesus” was used rather than “Jesus”, as depicted below within the following snapshot…

To this regard, it wasn’t until 1524 AD when Gian Giorgio Trissino, an Italian Renaissance grammarian known as the Father of the letter “J” established the letter “J” as, not only a prominent consonant within the Italian vernacular, but also influenced it to be a significant part of the English language. Initially, “I” was considered the same letter as “J”, although the sounds were different. Thus, prior to the letter “J”, the letter “I” was used predominately in its place, prior to 1524 AD. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

When the Gentiles attempted to transliterate His name, Yahushua (יהושוע), into Koine Greek, what resulted within the lengthened transitional process was… the translated name… rendered into the Greek Septuagint as “Ἰησοῦς” (Ihsous or Iesous or Iesus). And this was done several years indeed before Yahushua Ha’Maschiach had arrived and was blessed upon this Earthly existence. But as the process continued-on, from Greek to Latin, “Iesous” was changed, evolving to “Iesus or Iesvs”, where the “o” had dropped off. Then, as it carried-on into the English language, Yahushua’s name was further changed again as the adopted Italian “J” replaced the “I”, thus resulting in the name of “Jesus”, for which we now know today, indeed, far from the true name of the Messiah, Yahushua (יהושוע). Though, the name “Jesus” is the English translation, we must see that the name Jesus, in and of itself, are the leaves to the vine. But what are the roots? And, the answer is this:

THE ROOT TO THE VINE IS CLEARLY THE WORK OF “GENTILE-GREEK” INFLUENCES!

In summary, Jesus comes from the Greek name “Ἰησοῦς” (Ihsous or Iesous or Iesus), and in Latin “Iesus.” Furthermore, “Iesous” is adapted from the name of the Greek goddess of healing, “Ieso”. “Ieso” is the Greek goddess of recuperation from illness. Thus, can you see the resemblance between “Iesous” and “Ieso”, with the exception of “us” at the end of the Greek transliteration of Jesus? This Hellenized Greek version of Ha’Maschiach is not even the slightest bit in close proximity to the likeliness nor within the etymology of the 6-letter Paleo-Hebrew name of Ha’Maschiach: 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤅𐤏, phonetically pronounced YAH-HU-SHUA (YAHUSHUA).

But, in a more deeper respect, Ieso, according to Greek Mythos, is the daughter of Asclepius, who is furthermore the god of medicine and (get this) the son of “Apollo”. Now, to take things into perspective, as according to the Book of Revelation, the ‘king’ of the bottomless pit, or the abyss, is directly named “Abbadon”, meaning “the destroyer” in Hebrew, and (guess what) “Apollyon” within the Greek, which also means coincidentally enough “the destroyer”. Now, here’s the kicker: “Apollyon” is one of the spellings for the name of the Greek god “Apollo”. And HaSatan, Satan, the devil himself is also biblically referred to as “the destroyer”, oddly enough. Thus, to bring things together, Satan is the Greek god, Apollo. Can you see the connection? This is where Replacement Theology comes in to literally hi-jack and replace the true and authentic origins, meaning, and the significance of the true Aluah of the Hebrew Bible, 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YAHUAH), with Greek Gentile implantations as a replacement, so that the deceived and manipulated can worship another deity, as opposed to what was originally intended to be worshipped. In other words, the followers of Christianity, the followers of the Church, worship and idolize the Father of Lies, himself, Appolo/Appolyon (Satan).

TRUE ORIGINS OF THE LETTER “J” CLICK HERE TO WATCH THIS VIDEO

From all of this, within the transliterative process, between Greek-to-Latin-to-English, one cannot neglect to acknowledge the works of the very gentile nations and their influences in how they had literally (once more) applied Replacement Theology to superimpose the original with a new pagan implantation to water-down the meaning, let alone the virulence of the Hebrew original name. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

But when we are to examine Scripture even further, there is an anomaly that is present when we are to look at two particular passages when it comes down to questioning the name “Jesus”, in relationship to its Biblical counterpart “Joshua”, within the King James Version: Acts 7:44-45 (KJV) and Hebrews 4:7-8 (KJV) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

• “Our fathers had the tabernacle of witness in the wilderness, as he had appointed, speaking unto Moses, that he should make it according to the fashion that he had seen. Which also our fathers that came after brought in with JESUS into the possession of the Gentiles, whom God drave out before the face of our fathers, unto the days of David.” ~Acts 7:44-45 (KJV)
• “Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts. For if JESUS had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.” ~Hebrews 4:7-8 (KJV)

NOTE: But, when we are to examine the same verses but this time around, for example, within the NIV (instead of the KJV), we find that instead of “Jesus”, within its place is JOSHUA. This holds true for both Acts 7:44-45 and Hebrews 4:7-8. Can you say lost in the translation?

• “Our ancestors had the tabernacle of the covenant law with them in the wilderness. It had been made as God directed Moses, according to the pattern he had seen. After receiving the tabernacle, our ancestors under JOSHUA brought it with them when they took the land from the nations God drove out before them. It remained in the land until the time of David.” ~Acts 7:44-45 (NIV)
• “God again set a certain day, calling it ‘Today.’ This he did when a long time later he spoke through David, as in the passage already quoted: ‘Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts.’ For if JOSHUA had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.” ~Hebrews 4:7-8 (NIV)

NOTE: Have you noticed that between the King James Version (KJV) and the New International Version (NIV) that JESUS equates to JOSHUA? Thus, do both of these verses in Scripture make reference to Joshua, son of Nun, rather than the Messiah? In actuality, in context to the Scripture, the answer is an undeniable “Yes”. The individual being depicted here is indeed the Biblical Joshua who had brought the Tabernacle into the Promised Land. But besides the NIV, all other translations also place JOSHUA within the place of “Jesus”. And it doesn’t stop there, this phenomena also occurs in other parts of the Bible, too as well, like in Acts 7:45, where Steven speaks of his ancestors under Joshua, who also brought the Tabernacle into the Promised Land. However, according to the wording within the KJV, the tabernacle was brought in by “Jesus”. So, why is this the case?

The answer lies within the fact that the name “Jesus” is actually the same NAME as “Joshua”, Son of Nun, as depicted here within the transliteration. Though, they are different individuals within Biblical History, they both possess the same name, except that same name is neither “Jesus” nor “Joshua”. That same name is “YAHUSHUA”, meaning “Yahuah is Salvation” (H3091). Thus, in many ways, Scripture is utilizing the name Joshua or Yoshua as being the literal witness to the authenticity of the spelling and pronunciation of Ha’Maschiach: Yahushua (יהושוע), the 6-letter Hebrew name.

DOES THIS MAKE SENSE TO YOU?

“As far as just the name, in and of itself and in not making reference to the two individuals depicted Scripturally, the name ‘Jesus’ is the same name as ‘Joshua’, but in differing context. Both names are transliterated Hellenized versions of the Messiah’s name. Once more, though they are different individuals Biblically, they possess the same name preferentially in Hebrew, except that this particular same name when taken into correct etymological context, is neither ‘Jesus’ nor ‘Joshua’. Rather, it is the 6-letter Hebrew name, ‘Yahushua.’ (‎יהושוע)”

In other words, the Biblical name “Joshua” means “Yahuah is Salvation” (H3091), except that the true Scriptural name in Hebrew is actually יהושוע, pronounced Ya-Hu-Shua (Yahushua). “Joshua” is the transliterated Greek Hellenized version of Ha’Maschiach. Although, both names are spelled the same in Hebrew: יהושוע (The 6-letter Hebrew Name). Thus, what does this tell you? ANSWER: The name Joshua or Yoshua is literally the witness to the existence and legitimacy of the original 6-letter Hebrew name of the Messiah: Yahushua (יהושוע). It’s as if that if there was any question to the validity of Ha’Maschiach’s true name (Yahushua) later down the line throughout the many ages, in which this is most certainly the case as from what can be determined from this article, then this example alone in that there are two individuals, two witnesses, Biblically with the same name, validates the legitimacy of one with the other through the original 6-letter Hebrew name, whether one or the other is erroneously mistranslated through human error or intentionally transliterated through ill-willed intention. This is the difference between the true name of Ha’Maschiach (Yahushua) and the false name of Yahusha. Yahusha unfortunately does not possess that very important witness within Scripture. Once more, through the Son of Nun of the tribe of Ephraim, also known as Joshua or Yoshua or Yehoshua (as pronunciated by Mosheh in DIVREI HAYAMIYM RI’SHON or 1 Chronicles 7:27), this name in and of itself helps to validate and authenticate the true name of the Messiah, Yahushua Ha’Maschiach. Scripture interprets Scripture. And Scripture from within this case absolutely bears witness to complete the requirements from what Scripture has even delegated to. In many ways, this too is also prophetic:

• “In your Law it is written that the testimony of two people is true.” [YOCHANON] John 8:17
• “But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, that every charge may be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses.” [MATTITHYAHU] Matthew 18:16

IS THIS BECOMING MORE CLEAR TO YOU?

Although, as is the case here, the resemblance between Yahushua and Joshua is most certainly more similar than Yahushua and Jesus, in etymology. As you can see quite clearly that the names Yahushua (Yahu-shua) and Joshua (Jo-shua) both carry the same suffix “SHUA”. Thus, this is the reason, among several, as to why Yahushua is the true name of the Messiah, and not Yahusha (Yahu-sha), but considerably this rather moot point is neither here nor there. Furthermore, it is quite evident that the modern day form of “Jesus” doesn’t even remotely resemble the original name of the Messiah, Yahushua (יהושוע), for which the true disciples have made reference to, baptizing indeed in His Name, and in receiving so much criticism for teaching the Word of the Most High under His Name, the True Gospel of Hamaschiach. This is fact! Now, this is where the name “Yeshua” comes in, from where the English name Joshua comes from. “Yeshua” is literally the trans-fusion between “Jesus” and “Joshua”, as a result of such scribal-transliterative error, whether intentionally performed or accidentally superseded by coincidence. Now, if this is the case (which it is), straight off the bat, the name “Yeshua” is already based upon incorrectedness, for the name, “Yeshua” is rooted from the Hellenized name, “Jesus”. This is the main reason why other popularly-utilized names for the Messiah such as “Yeshua” is popularly used today. For, we must be extremely wary of the hand of the “Scribe”. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

• “How do ye say, We are wise, and the Torah of Yahuah is with us? Lo, certainly the lying pen of the scribes has made it a lie. The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken: lo, they have rejected the Word of Yahuah; and what wisdom is in them?” [YIRMEYAHU] Jeremiah 8:8-9

According to Marvin R. Vincent, author of Word Studies in the New Testament, “’Jesus’ is the Greek form or thus the transliteration of the Messiah’s Hebrew name, which has been borne by two illustrious individuals in former periods of the Jewish History—Joshua, the successor of Moses, and Jeshua, the high priest, who (with Zerubbabel) took such an active part in the re-establishment of the civil and religious polity of the Jews in their return from Babylon. Its original and full form is ‘Jehoshua’ or “Yehoshua” becoming by contraction Joshua or Jeshua.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

Thus, according to Marvin R. Vincent, “Jehoshua or Yehoshua” (Jeho-shua), as according to the more accurate English transliteration, is the full form of the Messiah’s original name, which resembles more in-tune to the Messiah’s real name in Hebrew, “Yahushua” (Yahu-shua). They both possess, not only the same likeliness, the same amount of vowels (four to be exact), and the same co-relationship within their shared suffix sound “SHUA”; as opposed to the name “Jesus” alone, which possesses two, let alone Yeshua or Jeshua, which possesses 3-vowels. Now, this is merely stated to intonate that “Jehoshua” (in utilizing the Italian post-Hebrew invented “J” sound) is the closest translation to “Yahushua”, although it is rarely used within the English vernacular to make reference to the Messiah. But, little do people in general know, let alone Biblical scholars, that “Jehoshua” is closer to the truth than we are more anticipated to believe, for “Jehoshua” is etymologically connected to the earlier form of Paleo-Hebrew, which is Ghabaray. Thus, the name of Ha’Maschaich, in Ghabaray, is “Yahoshua”, phonetically pronunciated as YAH-HO-SHUA. Can you see the similarities between Jehoshua, Yahoshua, and Yahushua. In either regard, they all share the same name, “SHUA”.

On the other hand, doctrinally, according to Scripture, when we are to align the name “Jesus” or let alone even “Yeshua” within the true name of the Most High Aluahym, Abba, our dear Father (Yahuah), “Yahuah” (יהוה) is not found etymologically within the Greek hellenized name of “Jesus”. This is most certainly very clear. There is no similarity, nor parallel in structure in prose. Although, when we are to look more into depth within this succinctly, the name “Yahuah” in Hebrew (יהוה) is most indeed found within the true Hebrew name of “Yahushua” (יהושוע). But, we will explore this fact in complete detail according to the more Hebraic vernacular side of things, shortly. Once again, this has been lost within the translation. In essence, the Father’s Name exists within the Son’s—“For my name is in Him.” The Son (the manifestation of the Most High within the flesh) affirms that He (within his Earthly-born name of Yahushua) also bears the Father’s Name (Yahuah): CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

• “I have come in the Father’s name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him.” [YOCHANON] John 5:43

Another literal witness, as according to [YOCHANON] John 8:17 and [MATTITHYAHU] Matthew 18:16, to the authenticity of the spelling and pronunciation of Ha’Maschiach, Yahushua (יהושוע)—let alone even the Creator Yahuah (יהוה), is the name Yahudah (יהודה). Indeed, it is most certainly common knowledge amongst Hebrew-speaking peoples that the pronunciation of the name “Yahudah” (יהודה), the Tribe of Judah, is phonetically sounded off as YAH-HU-DAH. Now, as this relates to the true and original pronunciation of the Creator’s name, the spelling for Yahuah (יהוה) is literally Yahudah, or YAH-HU-DAH, minus the “dalet” (ד) or the “d” sound in the middle of the name Yahudah (יהודה). Thus, as according to [YOCHANON] John 5:43, Scripture indeed interprets Scripture: As the true name of the Father is, not only found within the name of Ha’Maschiach, but also confirmed, in correct pronunciation and spelling through Scripture, the true name of Ha’Maschiach is also confirmed and validated through Scripture!

“And she conceived again, and bore a son. And she said, ‘Now, will I praise Yahuah (יהוה). Therefore, she called his name Yahudah (יהודה); and left bearing.” [BERE’SHIYTH] Genesis 29:35

Now, to make the evidence more clear, we will demonstrate for you how the pronunciation of the Original Hebrew form or the Classical “Biblical” Hebrew form of the names Yahuah and Yahushua are also similar to its origins in Ancient Paleo-Hebrew:

WHY THE PALEO-HEBREW IS THE SAME AS THE CLASSICAL “BIBLICAL” HEBREW CLICK HERE TO WATCH THIS VIDEO

And now as we are to venture into examining the pronunciation of Yahushua and Yahuah within the more deeper roots of its Ancient Paleo-Hebrew form, you will also surprisingly notice the exact similarities in structure and etymology, in comparison to the Modern Day Original Hebrew. When digging even deeper, the Samaritans are, according to themselves, the descendants of the Northern Tribes of Israel that were not sent into Assyrian captivity, and have continuously resided in the land of Israel. The Torah Scroll of the Samaritans use an alphabet that is very different from the one used on Jewish Torah Scrolls. According to the Samaritans themselves and Hebrew scholars, this alphabet is the original “Old Hebrew” alphabet, also called “Paleo-Hebrew.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

THE MOST HIGH ABISHUA IS ONE CLICK HERE TO READ THIS ARTICLE

NOTE: Can you see the similarities between Yahushua (Messiah) and Yahuah (The Most High Abishua)? In either the Original Hebrew Script Form or even in the Ancient Paleo-Hebrew (Abryt), for which we will use as an example here, Yahushua (Messiah) possesses all of the letters which sound-off similarly as the Father’s name. In this same regard, the Father’s name (𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄) possesses all of the Hebrew letters which sound-off similarly as the Messiah’s (𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤅𐤏), with the exception of the Shin or Shen (SH) and the Vav or Uau (U), pronounced together as “SHU”. The only difference between the two names is found within the tail-end of both names, where the “AH” sound is created by the “He” in the name Yahuah (𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄) and is similarly met with the “AH” sound for which is further created by the “Ayin” in the name Yahushua (𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤅𐤏). Thus, the two names, Yahushua and Yahuah, fulfills Scripture harmoniously as from from what can be determined from [YOCHANON] John 5:43: “I have come in my Father’s name.” (For, my name is within Him)

WHY THE CORRECT NAME IS YAHUSHUA AND NOT YAHUSHA CLICK HERE TO WATCH THIS VIDEO

Now, as we have described the origins of trans-scribal error, in relationship to the most common Biblical references to the Messiah (Jesus and Yeshua), we will now look at another name which has been gaining a great deal of popularity, as of late, and that is “YAHUSHA”. And when we are to differentiate the difference between Yahusha (Yahu-sha) and Yahushua (Yahu-shua), it is evidently found from the tail-end suffix, derived from both names: “SHA” and “SHUA”. As a brief summary, “SHA” essentially means “wickedness” when observed as a suffix added-on to other Hebraic words. Such words are Bersha (Ber-Sha), Resha (Re-Sha), and Rasha (Ra-Sha), specifically, but we will cover this topic more in-depth and in context later within this study. But one must most certainly think that if such words mean wickedness, when they are associated with word endings as in the suffix “SHA”, then why would the righteousness of Hamaschiach’s name be associated with such self-condemnation as in the elusive name, Yahusha (Yahu-Sha)?

Furthermore, when “SHA” is observed alone by itself, especially so when we are to search for its meaning from the online Strong’s Concordance, “SHA” cannot be found! But, in actuality, this may be the case for “SHA” is not a word. At best, it is only a suffix, most popularly associated with the tail-endings of most Hebraic words and names. Regardless, “SHA” supporters will often falsely make the connection between “SHA” and “YASHA” and they will assume so for “SHA” is found within the tail-end of “YASHA” (YA-SHA). This is simply a perfect example of the False Spirit of Presumption! Since “YASHA” means “to be saved”, “SHA” supporters will also proclaim that “SHA”, only a mere suffix, also means “to be saved”. This false and rather moot point or assumption is one of the biggest, although erroneous, arguments for “SHA” supporters, for it holds no solid ground, not even at the least bit. To the contrary, “SHUA”, on the other hand, is an actual word, and not a suffix, which does indeed possess a direct connection and correlation to the root word ”YASHA”. Another weak point that “SHA” Supporters will also erroneously use is when they direct attention to only the mere meaning of the word “SHUA” (H7769), which means “to cry out”. And (yes) “SHUA” indeed means to cry out. This is absolutely a fact; but then, they will only leave it there at a complete dead stop, whilst keeping you hanging without explaining further why this indeed is the end-all-be-all concluding factor as to why Ha’Maschiach’s legitimate name is not Yahushua. Such claims may even be made just to merely state that, “Why would the Father cry out?” Later within this article, I will describe in detail as to how the meaning of “SHUA”, to cry out, does play perfectly well into etymological context with Biblical Scripture and meaning. Well, ladies and gentlemen, this is most certainly a perfect example of how people will go extremely out of their way to take things absolutely out of context without utilizing Scripture to interpret and support Scripture as it clearly bears witness to truth and authenticity. From this alone, many “Yahusha” supporters and proponents of the “SHA” movement will attempt many times on over at great lengths to demoralize the very meaning of “SHUA”; and they will do so rather prolifically and wholeheartedly as a means to legitimize and justify the 5-letter Hebrew name, Yahusha (יהושוע or 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤅𐤏), as the literal “end-all be-all” explanation for the true name of the Messiah. But, in all honesty, this does not legitimize nor strengthen their cause nor argument, by any means—NOT EVEN CLOSE! There are other very important elements to this equation that must be considered in order to find Truth! But before we do so in deeply analyzing this further, let’s bring into this very important conversation (first) the influences of the Masoretic peoples, and their work of deception.

The Masoretes were groups of Jewish scribe-scholars who worked from around the end of the 5th through 10th centuries CE, based primarily in medieval Palestine (Jund Filastin) in the cities of Tiberias and Jerusalem, as well as in Iraq (Babylonia). They were known for creating a new system of writing, called the Nikkud, which utilizes a system of dots and/or dashes added to the consonants of Hebrew letters… in order to replace the real and true Hebrew sound within the original language. Thus, when utilizing this manufactured system of dots and dashes, the corrupted ancient Masoretic Hebrew name of the Messiah (not shown) consisting of 5-letters possesses three “slanting dots” under the shin. More specifically, these slanting dots are what can be referred to as the “Kubutz” and/or the “Shuruk”. The Kubutz (short “u”) and the Shuruk (long “u”) are combined to make the “You” sound. So, when this is utilized, the original Hebrew “Vav” from the 6-letter Hebrew name יהושוע (which also makes the short “u” sound) was no longer needed. Once more, for clarity, from within this transliterative process of further translating the true Messiah’s name, in utilizing this Nikkud system, the Vav or the Waw for the original 6-letter Hebrew name YAHUSHUA (יהושוע) was removed to produce the corrupted, watered-down, and incorrect modern day 5-letter name: YAHUSHA (יהושע). The following outline breaks-down the importance of this explanation:

TAKE NOTE: After adding back the “Vav” from what was taken-out from the corruption of Masoretic intervention through their Nikkud system, instead of יהושע which is the false 5-letter Hebrew name (Yahusha) for the Messiah, we now have the יהושוע, the correct 6-letter Hebrew name, which is (Yahushua), whereby the last portion of the Messiah’s name, with the addition of the “Vav”, sounds-off the last two syllables of the Messiah’s name as “SHUA”, thus YAHU-SHUA (YAHUSHUA)

In summary, the original name of Yahushua in Hebrew is actually 6-letters long (יהושוע) and not the 5-letters in Hebrew that we know today in the modern-day (יהושע). And why this is so significant to our argument, and to the Qodeshim (Protectors of Truth), is because the correct 6-letter Hebrew name is pronounced and spelled “Yahushua”. And, to the contrary, the incorrect and corrupted 5-letter Hebrew name is pronounced and spelled “Yahusha”. And the reason for this was because there was interference or an intervention made by the “MASORITES” who… removed the Vav or the Waw from the original ancient 6-letter Hebraic word (יהושוע). Although such a change is slight, this modification (seemingly intentional) absolutely changes the meaning of the name of Hamaschiach from one of opulence and wealth… to that of one associated with “wickedness”. And why would Hamaschiach be associated with anything that is wicked?

“For, I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one yod nor one tittle shall in no one wise pass from the Torah, till all be fulfilled.” [MATTITHYAHU] Matthew 5:18

“Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may guard the commandments of Yahuah Elohaykem which I command you.” [DEVARIYM] Deuteronomy 4:2

Thus, the modern day Hebrew word for the Messiah (יהושע) possesses only 5-letters, with the Vav or the Waw removed by the MASORITES, which clearly portrays the corruption instilled by the founding leaders of the MASORITIC people! And as you begin to do your own research within this study, you will find that the longer versions of most Hebraic text is most often the original root form of such words. This is so very apparent with the 6-letter Hebrew name, Yahushuah (יהושוע). CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

PROPHECY PROVES THE TRUE NAME OF MASHIACH IS YAHUSHUA CLICK HERE TO WATCH THIS VIDEO

YAHUSHUA AND THE ANCIENT MANUSCRIPTS CLICK HERE TO WATCH THIS VIDEO

“In order to legitimize the authenticity of the name Yahushua יהושוע, the 6-letter Hebrew, one must consider exploring the origins of its name from its earliest use within the most ancient of Hebraic (Aramaic) and Paleo-Hebrew inscriptions. And the significance within the research is absolutely tremendous. For example, 260,000 Hebrew manuscripts were discovered in an old synagogue in Cairo, 10,000 of which are biblical manuscripts. Among these findings, the Demascus Manuscripts are some of the revealing discoveries derived from this archeological dig. It is considered one of the foundational documents of the ancient Hebrew community of Qumran. This Damascus Document is a fragmentary text, whereby no complete version has survived, although within the several fragments of this very important text, inscriptions of the original name of Ha’Maschiach have been found. The Damascus Document is a 10th-century document that was copied from an earlier Hebrew source, and received its nickname due to the number of times in which the Syrian city is mentioned in it.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

“Additionally, there are more than 200 biblical manuscripts among the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Qumran Manuscripts, some of them (once more) written in Paleo-Hebrew. They were written before 70 CE. The Dead Sea Scrolls, also called the Qumran Caves Scrolls, are a set of ancient Jewish manuscripts from the Second Temple period. They were discovered over a period of 10 years, between 1946 and 1956, at the Qumran Caves near Ein Feshkha in the West Bank, on the northern shore of the Dead Sea. Coincidentally enough, Qumran has been mentioned Scripturally. Qumran as the City of Salt listed in Josh 15:62. The site, however, may be identified with Secacah, which is referenced in the same area as the City of Salt in the Book of Joshua 15:61. And, although the Qumran Manuscripts are much older than the Masoretic Texts, a much deeper Biblical analysis wouldn’t be complete without at least venturing to analyze indeed the details of such Masoretic Manuscripts, for comparative note.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

Now, to bring back the very point from what we had mentioned earlier where the names “Jesus” and “Joshua” were often used to attempt to depict the same spelling of the same name, but not necessarily depicting the same individual, the following example portrays this very point precisely, as the the 6-letter original Hebrew is displayed. Here are two places in the Masoretic Text where the longer correct spelling is employed. The following images portraying the verses for Deuteronomy 3:21 and Judges 2:7 is derived from the online resource at CHABAD.ORG (The Complete Jewish Bible with Rashi Commentary):

• “And I commanded Joshua יהושוע at that time, saying, ‘Your eyes have seen all that Yahuah, your Aluah has done to these two kings; so will Yahuah do to all the kingdoms through which you pass.” ~Deuteronomy 3:21
• “So the people served Yahuah all the days of Joshua יהושוע, and all the days of the elders who outlived Joshua יהושוע, who had seen all the great works of Yahuah which He had done for Israel.” ~Judges 2:7

Additionally, from within the Dead Sea Scrolls, the longer correct form in 6-letters is also indicated within the following “Dead Sea Scroll” Scriptural text. The following image depicting the verses for [YAHUSHUA] Joshua 6:7 and [YAHUSHUA] Joshua 8:3 are derived from the Qumran Biblical Dead Sea Scrolls Database:

• “Then the priests will blast on their trumpets, and everyone else will shout. The wall will fall down, and your soldiers can go straight in from every side. Then Joshua יהושוע called the priests together and said, ‘Take the chest and tell seven priests to carry trumpets and march ahead of it.’ Next, he gave the army their orders: ‘March slowly around Jericho. A few of you will go ahead of the chest to guard it, but most of you will follow it. Don’t shout the battle cry or yell or even talk until the day I tell you to. Then let out a shout!’” [YAHUSHUA] Joshua 6:7
• “So Joshua יהושוע and the whole army moved out to attack Ai. He chose thirty thousand of his best fighting men and sent them out at night” [YAHUSHUA] Joshua 8:3

Variant spellings are common in Hebrew (especially in names) and usually the longer spelling is the older and more correct form and the newer spelling is usually the end result of an extra letter that was not needed. Due to the fact that the Dead Sea Scrolls are older than the Masoretic text, and the longer spelling is more frequent in the Dead Sea Scrolls than the Masoretic text, it is most legitimately fair to say that the longer spelling was the original: Yahushua (יהושוע).

Because the language of Hebrew does not require to have the extra Vav or Waw to give us the “u” for the“-shua” sound (the Hebrew language does not always supply vowels), this would explain the shorter spelling for Yahusha (יהושע). It does not mean that the shorter spelling represents the correct pronunciation “Yahusha”, rather it simply means that the extra letter was unnecessary to get the “-shua” sound at the end of the name. Thus, if readers of Scriptural text are completely unaware of this, for the great majority of times (as is the case), the true original message in meaning and in vernacular is most certainly lost within the translation. To conclude, that the shorter spelling must mean the Messiah’s name is also pronounced “Yahusha”, ignores the fact that Hebrew words do not usually supply us with vowel sounds. Although, it does supply us with all the vowel sounds from within the 6-letter name Hebrew, Yahushua (יהושוע). But, within the Hebrew, it is not required. This is another big reason why the longer 6-letter Hebrew name of the Messiah, Yahushua (יהושוע) is more accurate than the shorter 5-letter Hebrew name, Yahusha (יהושע).

LET’S DIG DEEPER NOW TO DELINEATE THE DIFFERENCES… between “SHA’’ and “SHUA” (in Scripture) when pertaining between the following names of focus: CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

1. Yahusha (Yahu-Sha): Meaning of “Sha”—Erroneously connected to the term or word, “YASHA” meaning “To be saved” (H3467)
2. Yahushua (Yahu-Shua): Meaning of “Shua”—To cry out (H7769)

NOTE #1: Many people will ask as to why there is such a debate between whether the longer form of the Messiah’s name is more accurate than the shorter form, and vice-versa, but as we further deeply analyze the delineation between the two in meaning, you will significantly see the great differences. First of all, there is an exception to the rule within the differentiation between “SHA” and “SHUA” (H7768/H7769) and that very word particularly, as mentioned previously, is the word YASHA, which means “to be saved” or “to be delivered”. One would assume that YASHA lies in support for the “SHA” Movement, but this is most certainly far from being the case. But, this indeed (once more) is a perfect example of the Spirit of Presumption. Furthermore, YASHA (H3467) is, not only a verb, but it is the root word for its contracted forms, such as “Yashua” and “Shua”, and not (surprisingly enough) to “SHA”, for which “Yahusha Supporters” presume to be. And (yes) I will repeat this for clarity: “There is no connection, in and of itself, between the suffix ‘SHA’ and the actual word ‘YASHA’. “The suffix “SHA” with Scriptural Hebraic names does not provide any reference to the Hebrew “Aleph-Bet”, which means that it does not express a relationship with Yahuah, the Creator, but rather something else entirely: THE SPIRIT OF PRESUMPTION! (16:25) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

Thus, from this alone, when we are to make the comparison between Yahushua and Yahusha, it is more appropriate and Scripturally sound to proclaim that the true name of the Messiah is “YAHUSHUA”. Not only is the name “YAHUSHUA” etymologically correct in Modern Day Hebrew and in Ancient Paleo-Hebrew, but it is also correct in meaning as well, as “YAHUSHUA”, the name from within itself (as according to Strong’s Concordance), means “Yahuah is Our Salvation” (H3091).

But, when we also make reference to other names or words Biblically, we shall also find that “SHA” observed at the tail-end of words means “wickedness”, as from what can be assessed from the following Scripture:

1. Birsha – Bereshith 14: 2 (H1306: King of Gomorrah; King of Wickedness)
2. Resha – Deuterotomy 9:27 (H7562: Morally Wrong; Iniquity; Wickedness)
3. Rasha – Bereshith 18:23 (H7563: Morally Wrong; Condemned; Ungodly; Wickedness)

NOTE #2: Now, we must also take into account that “Shua” also means “to cry out”. So, with all of this said, it makes perfect sense to know and to understand that the meaning of “Yahushua” is “Yahuah is Salvation” (H3091). Now, “to cry out” does not only make reference to Hamaschiach, as according to [MATTITHYAHU] Matthew 27:46, when Yahushua cries out, “Eli Eli, Lamah Sabacthani!”, during the final moments of his life as a human being, Yahushua Ha’Maschiach, essentially the Most High Abishua made-manifest within the flesh; but the phrase “to cry out” is supported within context, as according to Psalm 34:17, from whereby “The righteous cry out, and Yahuah hears them; He saves and delivers them from all their troubles.” Thus, when you put it all together, once more within appropriate context and meaning, the name YAHUSHUA (YAHU-SHUA) completely means “Yahuah is Salvation” (Strong’s #3091) from whereby the righteous cry out and the Most High Aluahiym hears them. The Father, our Almighty Creator, is their Salvation, from whereby the Most High saves the righteous and delivers them.

But on the other side of things, even when “YASHA”, a verb (Strongs #3467), is used to make reference to a person, figuratively, “YASHA” (meaning: to open; to be safe; to deliver) is changed to “YASHUA”. When left alone as “YASHA”, it is referred to as a verb, but when “YASHA” makes reference to an actual person, in and of itself as a noun, this is where the word Yashua comes in from where it is specifically derived from “YASHA”. Thus, “Yashua” is contracted from its root form, “YASHA”. In other words, “Yashua” or “Y’shua” is a passive participle of “YASHA.” And “Yashua” (H3444) is where the suffix “Shua” is furthermore contracted from. So, essentially, this also helps to support that the true name of Hamaschiach (the Messiah) is “Yahushua” and not “Yahusha”.

WHY THE NAME IS IMPORTANT! Scriptural names provide meaning, respect and guidance! To refer to one’s appropriate name, especially for an individual of which you respect and hold honor to, the name is absolutely important. For example, would you ever call your wife by the name of your ex-girlfriend? Now, let’s flip it around and ask the very same question, but with different wording: “What if your wife calls you by the name of her male co-worker for whom you find out that she goes out with (during the weekends) along with her other girlfriends at the job? Now, one may think that there is some evidence of infidelity happening between the scenes here, but maybe not! Although, this could raise some unwarranted doubt, indeed. Thus, the answer for this very simple question is (oh) so very clear—Of course it would! Here are the three witnesses within Scripture as to why the true name of the Messiah/Creator is so very important in our very important relationship to Him:

1. “A good name is better than precious ointment; and the day of death than the day of one’s birth.” [SIRACH] Ecclesiastes 7:1
2. “A good name is to be chosen rather than great riches, loving favor rather than silver and gold.” [MISHLEI] Proverbs 22:1
3. “The memory of the righteous is blessed, But the name of the wicked will rot.” [MISHLEI] Proverbs 10:7

WHAT IS STRONG’S CONCORDANCE? Strong’s Concordance provides an index to the Bible. This allows the reader to find words where they appear in the Bible. It also lets the reader directly compare how the same word may be used elsewhere in the Bible. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

VARIABLE MEANINGS OF BIBLICAL WORDS… and/or names which possess the suffix (SHA or SHAH) at the tail-end of Hebraic words “DO NOT” possess the precious ointment, the great riches, the loving favor, nor the memory of the righteous, as can clearly be ascertained when we bear witness to test the spirits, according to [MISHLEI] Proverbs 22:1 and [MISHLEI] Proverbs 10:7:

1. Risha – [MISHLEI] Proverbs 7:5 (H7564: An evildoer; Also an evil king of Yisrael)
2. Baasha – [MAL’AKIY RI’SHON] 1 Melakim 15 (H1201: To stink)
3. Yerusha – [MAL’AKIY SHENIY] 2 Melakim 15:33 (H3388: Demon Possessed)
4. Shisha – [MAL’AKIY RI’SHON] 1 Melakim 4:3 (H7894: Pagan deity known as Sheva or Shiva)
5. Yoshbekeshah – [DIVREI HAYAMIYM RI’SHON] 1 Chronicles 25:4 (H3436: Seated in hardness)
6. Hushah – [DIVREI HAYAMIYM RI’SHON] 1 Chronicles 4:4 (H2364: Haste; Also known as “Usha”. Usha is known as the pagan goddess of the dawn)

VARIABLE MEANINGS OF BIBLICAL WORDS… and/or names which possess the suffix “SHUA” at the tail-end of these words “DO INDEED” possess the precious ointment, the great riches, the loving favor, and the memory of the righteous. Thus, this can clearly be ascertained from the following examples when we bear witness to test the spirits, as according to [MISHLEI] Proverbs 22:1 and [MISHLEI] Proverbs 10:7:

1. Abishua – Ezekiel 7:5 (H50: My Father Rescues; Father of Plenty; Prosperous)
2. Bathshua – (H1340: Daughter of Opulence; Daughter of Wealth)
3. Melchishua – 2 Samuel 14:49 (H4444: King of Wealth)
4. Yahushua – (H3091: Yahuah is Salvation; Yahuah Delivers; To be Open, Wide and Free; Salvation)
5. Alishua or Elishua – (H474: Yahuah is Deliverance/Salvation)

Now, let’s focus more precisely and in-depth into the meaning of “SHUA”, just to be fair. “SHUA” (Strong’s #7769) essentially means “riches; opulence; to deliver; to help; and to cry out for help (supplication)”. As from what “Yahusha” proponents will often declare in outright vigilance as to why the name “Yahushua” is not the correct name of the Messiah, is that this specific meaning alone, carries a highly negative connotation. But, to the contrary, when we are to respectfully analyze this meaning in better context, such a meaning is not so negative, at all! Actually, it is far from it! Rather, it carries a higher and more profound meaning in Hebraic Typology. The meaning of “SHUA” is supported by its eyewitness (as mentioned previously above), found uniformly once more from within [TEHILLIYM] Psalms 34:17, as Scripture states, “The righteous cry out, and Yahuah hears them; He delivers them from all their troubles.” Thus, when you put it all together, within appropriate context and meaning, the name YAHUSHUA (YAHU-SHUA) completely means “Yahuah is Salvation” (Strong’s #3091), similar to the meaning of Joshua as previously mentioned within this article, from where the righteous cry out and the Most High Abishua hears them. The Father, our Almighty Creator, is their Salvation. Now, this is not the kicker! This is only reiterated to add more of a specific special effect to what I will reveal to you.

The meaning of “to cry out” is also expressed in [MATTITHYAHU] Matthew 27:46, as abiding to be more true in its original translation by the Bantu traditions in ancient Aramaic, “And Yahushua cried out with a loud voice, saying, ‘Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani!’”—which is one of the most well-renown from amidst the very words of Yahushua Hamaschiach, but yet one of the most mistranslated. Though, we must consider the fact within Scripture, that the Most High would never forsake us, as according to [TEHILLIYM] Psalm 9:10, as it states, “Those who know your name will trust in you, for you (dear Father) have never forsaken those who seek you.” Always remember that the Father never contradicts Himself (BEMIDBAR 23:19). And, thus, there are many more passages within Scripture which also supports the promise and proclamation of the Father, that He, indeed, would never forsake us:

• “For Yahuah will not forsake His people; He will not abandon his heritage.” [TEHILLIYM] Psalm 94:14
• “For Yahuah loves justice and will not forsake His saints. They are preserved forever, but the offspring of the wicked will be cut off.” [TEHILLIYM] Psalm 37:28
• “For Yahuah will not forsake his people for His great name’s sake: because it hath pleased Abishuah to make you His people.” [SHEMUEL RI’SHON] 1 Samuel 12:22
• “Never will I leave you. Never will I forsake you.” [IVRIYM] Hebrews 13:5

Now, if the Greek translation is true and accurate, in that “Eli Eli Lama Sabacthani” truly and legitimately means “Lord, Lord, why have you forsaken me”, then these words alone would absolutely contradict the whole entirety of the WORD OF THE MOST HIGH, correct? Thus, in more appropriate context, the true meaning of Yahushua’s last words at the stake (MATTITHYAHU 27:46) in the ancient Bantu language is this: “Here! Here! This is for the Sabbath-keepers, the Keepers of Shabbat.” Indeed, this message only holds true for the the Sabbath-Keepers, the “Set Apart peoples, the Qodeshim, for the Qodeshim know of their Father, and the Father knows His people very well, the Set Apart for whom he has chosen in the End of Days!

• “Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks.” [YOCHANON] John 4:23
• “But, he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.” [MATTITHYAHU] Mathew 24:13-14

AND AS WE CLOSE-OUT THIS SCRIPTURAL STUDY… this is exactly why “SHA-UL” (PAUL) had to literally have the (-SHA) kicked out of him, so to speak, because of his wickedness in pagan practice, mysticism, theology, heresy, apostasy and rebellion; let alone failing to truly serving people, within the name of the Most High, Yahuah, our dear and wonderful Father for whom we give praise to! SHA-UL approved the death of Steven, acting as the accomplice to Steven’s murder, as SHA-UL had also ravaged the Set Apart assembly, the Temple of Yahuah in Jerusalem. This same SHA-UL lorded himself as the “SHAH” over the peoples between his powerful pharisaical, Jewish and Roman roles, but only to boastingly meet his own pride-filled needs as made accordingly to “His Gospel” and not the “Gospel of Yahushua”; thus demonstrating the very nature of his being: The literal “Sha” of his demon-possessed evil-doings; seated in hardness from amidst his own wickedness indeed, in thus serving his true master, HaSatan, himself!

• “And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.” [OORINTIYM SHENIY] 2 Corinthians 12:7

This statement by Paul verily proclaims that the very “master” for whom Paul receives his gifts from are not from Elohim, but rather from “The Father of Lies” himself, Satan. Thus why would a “Messenger“ of Satan be a thorn upon Paul’s side to keep him humble. If anything, it should rather be an Angel of the Most High to humble him, as a reminder (not a messenger of Satan), so much so that Paul would not become arrogant from the powers given to him, indeed by the very demons Paul summons upon within his own mystical practices, through Sufflation (Acts 9:1). And as far as Paul’s mysticism is concerned, we will talk about this more succinctly, later within this written work…

Thus, as the true name of the Messiah (Yahushua) shall be revealed, thus will be the same, in how the true nature of SHA-UL… shall also be exposed: The False Spirit of Presumption!

EXPOSING THE APOSTASY OF PAUL 2.0 CLICK HERE TO READ THIS ARTICLE

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Ayala Nunez is a former “New Age” writer and producer, bringing awareness to his story on how he experienced and encompassed the bulk of variable manipulative spiritual practices, theologies, concepts and influences, within the world of the “New Age Movement”, in search for Truth. But, along that darkened journey, he later encountered “Revelation”, once he began to walk away from this elusive and deceptive mind-control trap! He discovered, not only the path to “The Way” on his homecoming voyage back to the teachings of the True Messiah, Yahushua Hamashiach “‎𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤅𐤏”, but he also uncovered the root beginnings of Paganism (Ancient Babylonia) implanted deeply throughout many institutional spiritualities and religions of the world, the very same root foundation of proverbial “New Age” Theosophy. From this, he soon realized that the true pandemic of our times is none the viral, from what it may seem on the surface, but rather it is something which contributes more to that of a parasitic conundrum. And, because of this, his investigative journalism has led him hot-on-the-trail to that very mystery, from whence this symbiotic infestation had originally infiltrated the storyline of Humanity, since the Garden. Ayala has evolved from “New Age” influencer… to prolific Christian and Hebrew Bible Researcher… and to now a “Revealer of Truths” to expose the “Deception”. Ayala Nunez is the creator of his viral network blog, called “Walk Away From the New Age”, and is the host of his paradigm-shattering “Set-Apart” influenced podcast, called Quintessential Mark Radio 2.0 (QMR 2.0): The New Age Recovery Chronicles. Additionally, Ayala is the author of his book ‘Exposing the Apostasy: Tracking the Trail of the Wolf’ and is the Executive Producer and Founder of R3TV MINISTRIES LLC: The Rise of the Qodeshim—The Number #1 Source for Deep-Dive Investigative Journalism, Mental Health and Wellness, and Unapologetic “Scripture-Based” Broadcast On-Demand…

DISCLAIMER: “Always remember, when one adds to and perhaps even takes away from the Tanakh, as true ‘Set Apart’ followers of the Father, we (the Remnant) must persistently question with gifted discernment the deceptive doctrines for which faulty apostles and prophets preach (Devariym 4:2). Thus, this rather revealing discovery explains the foundations of what lies behind the very nature of what elusively ravages this earthly human domain, from what can only be described at its best, in Hebrew, as Dybbuk (דיבוק): The Elusive Subtlety of Demonic Deception! As once a former New Age influencer, I have experienced for myself the several ways in how vulnerable seekers of truth can be so easily led astray from the mark to salvation, indeed to the path of that authentic and legitimate Truth. Thus, the main aim of this announcement lies upon, not only placing righteous judgement upon questionable and manipulative practices (Yochanon 7:24), but in also exposing from amidst its venomous hierarchy, the nefarious agenda of the fallen and the devilish deeds of their own succubus. In helping to assist the world, to disengage from such otherworldly influences, in human parasitic deliverance, the creation of this broadcast is intended for the sake and sincerity of producing righteously-influenced outcomes, under the guidance of the ‘Spirit of our dear Abishua’, in consecration and devotion. Thus, this podcast, blog, and/or social media post is not meant to portray any notion of condemnation towards any-one-soul, institution, or group in particular; but rather possesses the sincere intention with utmost humility to share my own testimony from what I’ve encountered in ‘Revelation’ through the Grace of our Dear Father (The Most High Aluah), our Father as the Savior, Yahushua Ha’Maschiach (יהושוע), the Almighty Spirit of the Father (The Ruach Ha’Qodesh), and our Father through His Holy Word (The Tanakh), as ‘One’ and none the separate (Devariym 6:4). And when we, the Remnant, are to do so, to uphold, restore, and honor ‘His Name’, with such endearing and unrelenting praise, we free ourselves indeed, separate and apart, from the clutches of any principality, deeply founded upon its own wickedness. From this, such forces of necromancy, whom endorse the fallacy of elusive doctrine and false ideology, shall not sustain dominion over the ‘Might’ of the Most High, whom solely vindicates that proper ‘Authority’. This is all done in loyalty with utmost respect in obedience for the Glory of the Alishua—Our Almighty Creator—the One and Only True Father. Dear Abba (אבא) please do not forsake us, but forgive us and deliver us from all worldly deceit, as you are the ‘Alpha and the Omega’, the ‘Beginning and the End’ (את). Please bless us and protect us with ‘Your Understanding’, and not by our own understanding. We, the ‘Watchmen’, are repentant to ‘You’. We are loyal and obedient to Your All-Powerful Name—Yahuah (𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄) is One!” ~Ayala Nunez, Executive Producer and Founder of R3TV MINISTRIES LLC

NOTE: Based in the high desert from amidst the uncontested beauty found within the Valley of Phoenix (Arizona), R3TV Ministries LLC is a podcast video network, an online fellowship, created to provide the “Good News” to the world—The Glory of ‎𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (Yahuah)—Our Almighty Father! And as this online presence continues, through time-tested Testimony, to open the eyes of so many, whom have been lost to the ways of the world through the New Age and other ancient pagan influences, this faith-based ministry’s all-encompassing mission lies upon spreading indeed the “Moral Code of Righteousness” derived from the roots of the vine of original Mosaic Law (The Tanakh)—The True Living Word of the Most High Aluah, to all whom seek “His Name”. From within providence, what the select “set apart” shall reveal, will (not only be the manipulative mind control of Ancient Babylonia which still infiltrates all walks of life on earth today); but there is still another Truth, which is meticulously ordained to the “Remnant” to reveal. This Revelation lies within it, the responsibility of the “End Times” Qodeshim (The Natsarim) to uphold, honor, protect, and to creatively minister original, ancient and sacred “Hebraic” Scriptural Doctrine (Yirmeyahu 6:16). And as the lamps of the Qodeshim indeed are filled with the infinitesimal “Light of Abba”, the “Father of Lights”, may that same illumination be revealed to those of the “Lost Sheep of Yashar-Al” whom seek the “Truth” to return back to the Father, whilst desiring to continually walk, speak, breathe and to live… in Torah.