1. Was the Apostle Paul even a truly-appointed Apostle by Yahusha Hamaschiach – Jesus Christ?

2. Do Paul’s personal accounts at Demascus line-up with a consistent storyline, or does it pile-up with other disparities, for which has severely damaged Paul’s credibility report?

3. Do the origins of the Christian Church deeply-root in connection to Paganism and Pagan Rome, prophesied in Daniel 2:31-35?

4. Does the foundation of the Church root itself entirely from the Gospels according to Paul, or the true Teachings of the True Messiah?

5. Could it be perhaps that the true Hebrew meaning to Paul’s previous name, Sha’ul of Tarsus, be that of a more hellish and nefarious nomenclature, than that to support the definition of a true Apostle, let alone the Gospels of the True Messiah?

6. Is there evidence to conclude that Paul intermingled within and among the highest precincts of the Roman establishment under its protective custody?

7. Could it be that under today’s psychiatric standards that Paul exhibits prime characteristics of a Pathological Liar (Pseudologia Fantastica), Self-Entitlement, Hypocrisy, and Narcissism?

8. Did Yahusha Hamaschiach (Jesus Christ) forwarn his Disciples concerning the Dangers of Paul, in Scripture?

9. Was Paul a Mystic, highly influenced by outside forces, perhaps even by a secret society of sorts? The Tribe of Benjamin?

10. Does the Gospel of Paul (Pauline Christology) go against and contradict the True Teachings of Christ and The Law of God?

11. Did Paul have consistent disputes against the Disciples? Peter? Barnabas? James?

12. Did Peter ever truly endorse Paul in Scripture?

13. THE NAIL IN THE COFFIN: Could it be that Paul murdered James?

CHAPTER I: The Apostle Paul was Never an Appointed Apostle

CHAPTER II: The Investigative Journalism Begins – The Importance of Scripturally-Based Research

CHAPTER III: Let’s Talk About the Hebrew Roots Movement – The Importance of Transparency!

CHAPTER IV: My Beginnings, the New Age, and the Pagan Dilemma

CHAPTER V: The Fourth Beast, the Book of Daniel, and Nebuchednezzar’s Dream

CHAPTER VI: The Origins of Church – The Pagan Root Foundation of Early Christianity

CHAPTER VII: The Case for the Holy Trinity – Another Pagan Practice (A Tradition of Men)

CHAPTER VIII: Paul, the Gates to the Underworld, and the Antichrist

CHAPTER IX: The New Testament – An Ancient Biblical Battle of Epistles

CHAPTER X: Paul Was Not Only a False Apostle, but He was Also a Literal Double Agent for the Roman Empire…

CHAPTER XI: Paul Was a Pathological Liar and (Guesss What) There is Scripture to Prove It!

CHAPTER XII: Lies at Demascus – Three Separate Accounts of Paul’s Conversion are Inconsistent…

CHAPTER XIII: Mental Illness and the Apostle Paul – A Conundrum of Mass Proportions…

CHAPTER XIV: Yahusha Hamashiach (Jesus Christ) forwarned the Disciples Concerning the Dangers of Paul…

CHAPTER XV: Pauline Christology, Mysticism, and the New Age Alchemical Mindset of Christ

CHAPTER XVI: Rebellion and the Antichrist – How the Gospel of Paul Goes Against the Teachings of the True Messiah and the Law of God

CHAPTER XVII: Repeated Disputes Between the True Gospel of Yahusha Hamashiach, His Disciples and the False Gospel According to Paul

CHAPTER XVIII: Peter Never Endorsed for Paul!

CHAPTER XIX: The Nail in the Coffin – Is there a Possibility that Paul Murdered James?

“And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.” ~Mathew 24:10-14 KJV


I understand that the conclusion presented here from my Biblical research is a threat to many Christians, and along with the very ground for which their Christian institution stands upon. And thus, many will be offended, as I (too) was also offended by such Truths, when I was a former Christian, myself, not too long ago. I was quite shocked when this information was guided upon to me by the MOST HIGH. This information was even more offensive to me, as I was entirely basing the foundation for my up-and-coming book from more of an Orthodox Christian viewpoint. Although, since opening-up to this Revelation in Truth, the reason as to why I don’t consider myself today a Christian, were among many; but the evidence presented before you within this article, absolutely takes the cake! And because of such damning evidence against the church, along with the heresy of Paul, I have walked away from its hypocrisy. Now, the main aim of this declaration is not to attack, denigrate nor condemn people of the Christian faith, but rather it is focused upon the actual institution in and of itself, and the false spirit behind the faith.

“They that put their trust in Him shall understand the Truth: and such as be faithful in love shall abide with Him: for grace and mercy is to his QODESHIM, and He has care for His elect.” ~Wisdom of Soloman 3:9 (Cepher)

Today, I call myself Hebrew. For, the original Biblical Text (The Tanakh) is written in HEBREW, Yahusha Hamaschiach (Jesus Christ) was HEBREW when he was here upon the earthly plane, and he spoke in Aramaic, a Semitic language of the Northern Central, or Northwestern, group that was originally spoken by the ancient Middle Eastern people (known as Aramaeans), which is most closely related to Syriac, Phoenician, and HEBREW. So, doesn’t it make sense, perhaps, to call myself HEBREW, if I am here (now) in following his truest of ways? For me, it is very logical, as well as for many others of whom are following “The Way”. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

I am not the only one, although we are few and of the set apart, for the Path runs narrow (Mathew 7:13-14). But, if you are curious, I don’t consider myself to fall within the same category as Rabbinic Judaism (whom do not believe in the Messiah), nor do I ascribe to their ancient Jewish Talmud. Simply put, I am the Qodeshim…

“In the latter days, an example of judgment shall be made of them in righteousness before the QODESHIM; while those who have received mercy, shall forever, all their days, bless Elohiym, the Everlasting King.” ~Enoch 26:3 (Cepher)


Now, before I present the results of this investigation (here) which focuses upon this very sensitive and controversial topic (the heresy of the False Apostle Paul) I would like to make a statement, merely to say that I am not coming from the angle of what a few have already accused me of, being tied to what is called the Hebrew Roots Movement. Listen, I am all about bringing glory and honor to the MOST HIGH GOD, and that is it. I am only about Scripture, for the answers lie, from neither you nor me, it lies within that Moral Code – True Hebraic Scripture. Please do not believe me, nor trust me for that matter, for how can any man be trusted, but I do ask from you to please trust in Him and in His Word, the Word of God (The Tanakh), the origins of true Hebraic Scripture, and even more so what should have been the true root foundation of the Christian Church, and not the restructured Gospels of Paul. But, unfortunately, this is not the case.

“And he said, Yahuah came from Ciynai, and rose up from Se’iyr unto them; He shined forth from Mount Paran, and he came with ten thousands of his QODESHIM: from his right hand went a fiery law for them.” ~Deuteronomy 33:3 (Cepher)

When GOD, the Most High Adonai, told me in Truth and in Knowing (not of voice nor that of a whisper) to research this information in-depth, I questioned it and (once more) I was quite offended by it! And I resisted this offer to take-up this quite hefty and enormous task as presented to me by the Most High to expose this truth on my end, for weeks, until I was urged and triggered to start diving into the investigation. And the trigger which begun the research for me, was when Elohim showed to me that the Apostle Paul (Sha’ul of Tarsus) wasn’t even one of the Twelve originally-appointed Disciples, by the True Messiah, Yahusha Hamaschiach. Throughout all this time, I thought that he was one of the Twelve! Rather, Paul was self-appointed. He was a self-declared authority of the Teachings of, not the true historical Jesus Christ (Yahusha Hamaschiach), but rather to that of another entity. And, once more, this first initial bout of Revelation blew my world apart! It ripped the very foundation of which was the basis to most of what I have returned back to, since walking away from the New Age Lie – Ancient Babylonia! And so, with this said, we as the Qodeshim are commanded by the Most High God to test the spirits, and the very spirit for whom we are commanded to test, is the questionable spirit behind Paul, whom calls himself Apostle…

“Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already. Little children, you are from God and have overcome them, for he who is in you is greater than he who is in the world. They are from the world; therefore they speak from the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God. Whoever knows God listens to us; whoever is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the Spirit of truth and the spirit of error.” 1 John 4:1-6


The 12 Disciples/Apostles of the True Messiah (Yahusha Hamashiach) were the foundation stones of Yahusha’s gospel, and not intended to be the gospel of Paul’s, which is opposite the teachings of the Messiah, for whom several within the Discipleship wrote portions of The New Testament Bible, as in the case with Peter and James. Although the true leader of the “The Way” according to Yahusha, was his half-brother James, known as “James the Just”. Twice in Scripture, is it well indicated that there are only twelve assigned Apostles, which represent the twelve foundations from the wall of the New Jerusalem, for which their names are exclusively inscribed within those very walls. It is evident, therefore, that Elohim attaches great importance to these 12 great men. But, it doesn’t look like the Apostle Paul is found within the following list of those Disciples. Thus, this is where the problem begins. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

1. Peter

2. James

3. John

4. Andrew

5. Bartholomew or Nathanael

6. James, the Lesser or Younger

7. Judas (Matthias replaced Judas)

8. Jude or Thaddeus

9. Matthew or Levi

10. Philip

11. Simon the Zealot

12. Thomas

Here is one quite interesting fact to start off with: The Apostle Paul was called an “apostle” somewhere around the vicinity of 150 times in Scripture, and (once more) Paul was never anointed as an “apostle” – NEVER! But, 149 times out of that 150, Paul had made it known within Scripture that he was an “apostle”. None of the original Twelve Disciples called themselves an apostle. But, there was only that one who declared himself as so, and it was Paul, who has never been appointed as an apostle. Already, from this, lies the Hypocrisy! Now, I’d hate to say this (for it being only the very beginning of this article), for it doesn’t help the side of Paul any, at the least bit, but this is a perfect example of when people exhibit a great deal of “Self-Entitlement”, but to only their own dismay. But disturbingly enough, that one time in Scripture for which the title of “apostle” was not proclaimed by Paul, at all, was when Paul himself was accused as being a False “Apostle”. And this rather damning passage in Scripture, against Paul, can be found with the Book of Revelation 2:2

The only church for which Paul started in Asia was Ephesus. Paul was known as the Apostle to Ephesus. This was quite a known fact Biblically speaking. In Revelations, Scripture states that the Apostle Paul was tried and founded to be a false Apostle. In Revelation 2:2 (KJV), Scripture states, “To the angel of the church in Ephesus we write: ‘These are the words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks among the seven golden lampstands. I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have TESTED (trialed) those who claim to be APOSTLES BUT ARE NOT, and have found them FALSE.’”

Biblically, once more, Paul has always been known as the Apostle to Ephesus, but just to make a point in ensuring to the reader that this is the case, in Ephesians 1:1 (KJV), Paul identifies himself most certainly as the APOSTLE to the Church of Ephesus. This letter is from Paul from within the Book of Ephesians, “Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God. To God’s holy people in Ephesus, the faithful in Christ Jesus: Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.” ~Ephesians 1:1-2

Then, in 2 Timothy 1:15 (KJV), Paul is rather befuddled as he finds out that the Church of Ephesus has placed Paul under judgement (trialed) and ruled to be a FALSE APOSTLE: “You are aware that all who are in Asia turned away from me, among whom are Phygelus and Hermogenes.”


And to further validate the illegitimacy of Paul’s Discipleship, there are two indications within the Hebrew and in the Christian Bible where it states that there are only Twelve initially-appointed Disciples. They can be found within… Revelation 21:14 and Mathew 19:28:

“And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.” ~Revelation 21:14 (KJV)

“And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.” ~Mathew 19:28 (KJV)


Thus, this is when I started the research when I was revealed this truth. And I asked Adonai specifically, “Yes, I can do this work, dear Father, but I am going to need to back it up by Your Word, Your Scripture. By no means am I a theologian, nor a scholar; but I am going to need Your Help and Assistance through all of this, to lead me to the right direction in Scripture. I cannot do this alone, for I don’t even know where to start. Though, I trust in You. I know that you will show me ‘The Way’”. And wouldn’t you believe, the evidence through this Divinely-Guided investigative journalism was literally poured onto my lap, as easily and ever-so-abundantly as a waterfall pours itself into its own oasis below, into the river. It was such a wealth of knowledge! Now, here it is presented to me the very task to organize all of it into words, to where an elementary third grade child could even understand. And, from this, beholds my purpose.

Thus, the research presented before you within this article is purely Scripturally-based, and also supported by scholars of whom are not directly related to this Hebrew Roots Movement for which I have been accused of, nor from any other institution which goes predominantly against the supporters of Pauline Christology. Therefore, the scholars for which I have selected for this publishing is are strong well-worthy researchers, and funny (to say) how their scholarly investigative journalism has directed themselves to exactly my same conclusions, against the works of the Apostle Paul. These researchers are clearly unbiased, as you will see for yourself, as you perform your own investigation, but their conclusions still surprisingly parallel mine, not only from the clearly obvious data points, but also in theology, discernment, and in the mystical point of view, from where I also come from, historically, in New Age spirituality.

Now, in addition to this, I come from all angles, from the New Age community, Mysticism and the Mystery Schools, the Pagan mindset, the Rosicrucians Order, the Catholics, the Christian Orthodoxy, and the Hebrew. Regardless, my purpose here in the now is to find truth, unbiased. Most certainly, I was expecting that Christianity would hold all the answers to that Truth, instead from the investigative journalism, I have found that it held much of the problems. And Paul is central to those rather profound inconsistencies, indeed. To be honest with you, since we are coming from a place of honesty and Scripture, I know more about the origins and roots to Christianity than this so-called Hebrew Roots Nomenclature, for which I know nothing about. In the now, as we speak, as I am currently writing this article, I am looking-up online the definition of “Hebrew Roots Movement”. And, I will provide that definition for you in the next segment…


Now, have you, I was never influenced by the Hebrew Roots Movement, none whatsoever. If anything, I didn’t even know what it was, as I leered further and farther away from Christian doctrine when I synchronistically discovered that the name Yahweh was used quite prolifically within the Church today. And this name never rang a bell for me. It just didn’t feel right. And so, this is when I began to research it. And, let’s be real, there’s nothing wrong with asking a simple question. I come from the old school ways of thinking, and the only dumb question is the question never asked. So, after digging into the data, I found that the name Yahweh was actually a pagan deity, a Babylonian moon god, of which was utilized to ascribe to and name the Most High God, the same Biblical God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Come to find out, that within the place of YHWH, within Hebrew Scripture, was implanted into its place (over 6000 times) substitution words such as Lord, God, and Yahweh, when the Hebrew text was translated into the current modern day Bible that we read today, from amidst its many confusing and diverse translations. From this, I wrote the following article:



And the reason why I am going into this direction within the beginning portions of this article is to reveal a truth within the process of discovery. So, when I uncovered the reality of the undenying presence of Pagan origins with the common use of the name Yahweh, utilized in many Christian sermons today, I found that the journey was leading me towards another direction. But, let’s define (first of all) as to what the Hebrew Roots Movement is all about. According to, the definition of the Hebrew Roots Movement is the following:

“The premise of the Hebrew Roots movement is the belief that the Church has veered far from the true teachings and Hebrew concepts of the Bible. The movement maintains that Christianity has been indoctrinated with the culture and beliefs of Greek and Roman philosophy and that ultimately biblical Christianity, taught in churches today, has been corrupted with a pagan imitation of the New Testament gospels. Those of the Hebrew Roots belief hold to the teaching that Christ’s death on the cross did not end the Mosaic Covenant, but instead renewed it, expanded its message, and wrote it on the hearts of His true followers. They teach that the understanding of the New Testament can only come from a Hebrew perspective and that the teachings of the Apostle Paul are not understood clearly or taught correctly by Christian pastors today. Many affirm the existence of an original Hebrew-language New Testament and, in some cases, denigrate the existing New Testament text written in Greek. This becomes a subtle attack on the reliability of the text of our Bible. If the Greek text is unreliable and has been corrupted, as is charged by some, the Church no longer has a standard of truth.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

So, how about that? I guess there’s no need to go any further than that! No need to write this article, by any means (I guess), correct? I say this sarcastically, of course, but this fairly for the most part, sums it all, right there, in a nutshell! How synchronistic is that? Originally, I felt that there was no need to describe this movement (that I was accused of) because, once more, I was not influenced by this movement, for I had not an inkling of a clue as to what this movement was actually all about. Proverbially speaking, what came first, the egg or the chicken? But, for the sake of all fairness, in retrospect, I included the definition of the Hebrew Roots Movement within this article. Oddly enough, when I looked it up, the naturally-thought-out investigative journalism that I experienced for myself led me straight to the same conclusions as this Hebrew Roots Movement, although not influenced by it (at all) by the least bit! Regardless, from whatever source it comes from, Truth is Truth and will always be a Truth, correct?

“So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed him, ‘If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.’” ~John 8:31-32

So, people unknowingly call this type of research, the belief within it, and the stance for which such researchers take as “The Hebrew Roots Movement”. But, when one is able to analyze this “Name-Calling” by those who are offended by such a cause, you really have to wonder why they (whomever they are), why “they” adamantly label this movement defensively with such a demoralizing label – The Hebrew Roots Movement? In many ways, it is quite slanderous, antisemitic, and (very much so) a self-defensive mind-control prompt to leer you away from the source of the real problem. Always remember, when one single index finger is pointing in a certain direction, one with the eyes to see and the ears to truly know must not look in the direction of the finger-pointing, but rather one must be more conscious that there are three other fingers pointing straight back at them, the finger-pointer! Thus, it’s not the simple fact that we are digging deep into the roots of the Hebrew anything, but rather that we are digging deep into the roots of the origins of Christianity, instead. And then when we ultimately realize the greater amount of paganism associated to the origins of Christianity, we are then forced to question things even further, then to eventually move further away from Christianity, and to move towards to the Truth, from where it all began, the very source from where the proverbial Church was supposed to be well-connected to from since the very beginning – Our Hebrew Roots to original Hebraic Text. So, we should reframe (thus rename) this Hebrew Roots Movement, and call it instead, “The Pagan Christian Roots Movement”. This sounds more logical to me!


When I moved to Arizona, I dove deep into the Greek Orthodoxy, for just a little time. The very people of whom have led me into this world, I will always be grateful to and thankful to them, for they are truly of a good stock, who believe wholeheartedly to what they attribute to in custom, membership and in their Romanian traditions, in terms of the Orthodoxy, but they too are deceived by the hypocrisy of Paul. Little did they know at the time, that I was deeply researching the history of the Orthodox Church. From this, I truly had to make clear as to what I was getting into, as so to make sure and for certain that I wasn’t being led into another deceitful trap. As yours truly, one of whom was quite severely deceived by the New Age Deception, I absolutely did not desire to fall deceived once more, bait-and-switched into another false institution.

Now, for those who do not know of my Testimony, I was a former follower and active participant of the New Age Movement for a good 11-12 years. From this, I practiced Kundalini Yoga and Past Life Regression Therapy. I traveled the world rather prolifically to sacred sites, like Machu Picchu, Chichen Itza, the Great Serpent Mound of Adams County (Ohio), and Sedona (Arizona), in order to perform Pagan rituals. I hosted my own New Age Talk Show, called Quantum Mindfulness Radio and I also ran a New Age podcast radio network, called REAL REVOLUTION RADIO X.O. Additionally, I was also a Rosicrucian, a Mystic, and a Mystery Schools Initiate (as mentioned previously) and I was involved in many so-called spiritual acts of Necromancy, of which are not pleasing (of course) to the Eyes of our Dear Father, the Most High Adonai.

By no means am I proud nor do I feel righteous in the now about what I was and in what I had performed and done as a New Ager in those 11-12 years, but I do seek forgiveness. And the Most High, our Dear Father has already forgiven me. For this, I am grateful! And this is the reason why I do what I do, to help people to snap out of that Black Magic spell (in either the New Age or in the modern day Church) as induced by that false holy spirit, the kundalini false spirit which is ravaging the modern day church today…

“There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch. Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee.” ~Deuteronomy 18:10-12 (KJV)

So, with this said, the reason why former New Agers do indeed start to begin to see the paganism within the many elements of the church today (after being influenced by the darkness of the New Age) is because we have been exposed indeed to the paganism (indeed), the Satanism, and the False Doctrine, through the New Age. When you live and breathe by the works of Satan, within such Babylonian influences; and then when you walk away from it after snapping out of that black magic spell, to yet still see and sense the same contradiction, the paganism and hypocrisy within the church today, we possess no other choice but yet to say something about it. We do this, not because we enjoy doing it, in seemingly a sarcastic and perhaps a condoning way, but rather we do this because we really do care. Former New Agers do not like nor desire the succinct feeling of being suckered-in and baited, gas-lighted by the lies! No one does!

So, in coming from such a place, a background exposed to such darkness, it wasn’t difficult to find nor discover that the origins of the Church was established (also) through Pagan roots. This is fact, not some sort of conspiracy theory. This is fact. And Paul was one among the original progenitors, who started many churches under his New Age Ministry, of sorts. He is a self-proclaimed authority and the Father of many Christian False Churches, similar to the Eastern Greek Orthodoxy rooted from the very first gentile Christian Church at Antioch, as inspired by Pagan Roman influences. According to the book, Door to Paradise: Jesus Christ in Ancient Orthodoxy, the Eastern Greek Orthodox Church branched off of the 5 major patriarchates in Jerusalem, Antioch, Constantinople, Alexandria and Rome (JACAR). Specifically, the Orthodoxy arose from the precincts of Antioch, as influenced by Pagan Rome, as so was the case with the other four patriarchates. From there, the Catholic Church branched off from the Orthodoxy in 1054, and then in the 1500’s was when the Protestant Reformation occurred, thus stemming-away from the Catholic Church lineage, some 500 years or so later. Thus, the three roots of the origins of Church have originated from these three main founding religions: The Christian Orthodox, Catholicism, and the Protestants.


In Biblical Prophecy, similar to the very feet and legs of the statue within Nebuchadnezzar’s dream, the IRON legs (Representative of the Roman Empire) and the CLAY feet (Representative of the Church) is the very foundation of the four pagan gentile nations (Daniel 2:31-35) of whom would deceive the world through this false spirit of the Fallen: “Your Majesty looked, and there before you stood a large statue—an enormous, dazzling statue, awesome in appearance. The head of the statue was made of pure gold (Babylon), its chest and arms of silver (Persia), its belly and thighs of bronze (Greece), its legs of IRON, its feet partly of IRON (Rome) and partly of baked CLAY (Church). While you were watching, a rock was cut out, but not by human hands. It struck the statue on its feet of iron and clay and smashed them. Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver and the gold were all broken to pieces and became like chaff on a threshing floor in the summer. The wind swept them away without leaving a trace. But the rock that struck the statue became a huge MOUNTAIN and filled the whole earth.” ~Daniel 2:31-35 NIV

In the following commentary on Daniel 2:31-45, the historical fulfillment of Daniel 2:31-45 is explained and the fourth and fifth kingdoms are identified.  The statue composed of four different metals represents the succession of empires that were to rule over Israel before the establishment of the fifth kingdom, the kingdom of God.  Babylon is the head of GOLD; Medo-Persia, the chest and arms of SILVER; Greece, the belly and thighs of BRONZE; and Rome, the fourth kingdom, is the legs of IRON.  These four secular empires ruled over Israel before it grew to become a Christian nation during the thousand years between the Jewish War with Rome in A.D. 66 and the Crusades beginning in A.D. 1095.  The fifth kingdom that supplants the fourth kingdom, Rome, is… the Christian church, the CLAY. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

MORE CONSISTENT PARALLEL INTERPRETATION: This image, Nebuchednezzar’s Statue, essentially represents the kingdoms of the earth, the original pagan gentile nations, that should successively rule the nations, and influence the affairs of the church, the CLAY. The head of GOLD signified the Chaldean empire, then in being (Babylon). The breast and arms of SILVER signified the empire of the Medes and Persians. The belly and thighs of BRONZE signified the Grecian empire, founded by Alexander. The legs and feet of iron signified the Roman empire. The Roman empire IRON branched into ten kingdoms, as the toes of these feet. The stone cut out without hands, represented the kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ, which should be set up in the kingdoms of the world, upon the ruins of Satan’s kingdom in them. This was the Stone which the builders refused, because it was not cut out by their hands, but it is become the head stone of the corner. Of the increase of Christ’s government and peace there shall be no end. The Lord shall reign, not only to the end of time, but when time and days shall be no more. As far as events have gone, the fulfilling this prophetic vision has been most exact and undeniable; future ages shall witness this Stone destroying the image, and filling the whole earth. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

Now, for anyone who possesses the logic to see, a foundation built upon the brittleness and weakness of clay, throughout the length of its time cannot hold the bulk of that overwhelming weight, laden upon its shoulders. In other words, the lies, corruption, the wickedness and false doctrine as initially founding the very base of this entire institution of the church, as reacted upon by Paul and his heresy will crumble and fall by the wayside on its footprint from the very “Rock” thrown at it from the highest MOUNTAIN

“It shall come to pass in the latter days that the MOUNTAIN of the house of the Lord shall be established as the highest of the mountains, and shall be lifted up above the hills; and all the nations shall flow to it” ~Isaiah 2:2 NIV




Regardless, one must never ever forget that Yahusha taught from The Old Testament. But when we are to break things down to perspective, one cannot avoid the fact that half of the New Testament is Paul, for which the Church is deeply-founded upon today (The Clay). But before we go through the list of which comprises the epistles of Paul, in order to grasp a bird’s eye view of what books in particular and how much The New Testament is heavily impacted by Paul, we must briefly examine the Origins Story of the Christian Church. Thus, in order to truly understand the origins of church, one must possess a thorough understanding of its Timeline…

1000 BC: The First Temple Period – During the First Temple period (1200-586 BC), the First Temple was built in 1000 BC by King Solomon after King David conquered Jerusalem and made it his capital.

597-538 BC: Babylonian Captivity – The Babylonian Captivity occurred when the Jewish people faced exile from Israel. Being forced to leave Judah, they lived in Babylon between 597 BCE and 538 BCE. This captivity lasted until they were freed by Persian leader Cyrus the Great.

586 BC-70 AD: The Second Temple Period – The beginning of the Second Temple period (586 BC-AD 70) is marked by the return of Jews to Jerusalem from their exile in Babylon in 538 BC. They were allowed to return under an edict issued by Cyrus King of Persia. By 515 BC the reinstated Jewish residents had completed building the Second Temple.

539 BC: Babylon fell (Gold)

330 BC: Medo-Persia fell – The Persian Empire, also known as the Achaemenid Empire, lasted from approximately 539-331 BC (Silver)

323 BC: The Greek Empire began its decline and eventual fall after the death of Alexander the Great (Bronze)

3 AD: In February 27th 3 AD, the Church of Antioch was the first of the five major churches of the early patriarchate in Christianity with its primary seat in the ancient Greek city of Antioch (present-day Antakya, Turkey). It was here when the first Christian Gentile Church was birthed. According to Acts 11, at the start of their missionary journeys, Paul the Apostle and Barnabas created a church and preached in Antioch for a year, during which time the followers of the church were called “Christians” for the first time. This was the first mention of the name “Christian” within the Bible.

33 AD: The Orthodox Church is the one Church founded by Jesus Christ and his apostles, begun at the day of Pentecost with the descent of the Holy Spirit. It is also known (especially in the contemporary West) as the Eastern Orthodox Church or the Greek Orthodox Church.

44 AD: Apostle James Martyred, Stoned to Death

57 AD: Apostle Peter Martyred, Crucified Upside-Down

60 AD: Apostle Mathew Martyred, Staked to Death

98 AD: Apostle John, Died as an Old Man, the only Apostle who Died Peacefully into Old Age

62-64 AD: From Christian Tradition, St. Paul the Apostle (original name Sha’ul of Tarsus) died between 62–64 CE, Rome [Italy], one of the leaders of the first generation of Christians, often considered to be the most important person after Jesus in the history of Christianity, whereby populations within that era went from worshipping Sol Invictus to Christ in the Battle of Noveas. This is when the Sign of the Trinity was birthed into practice…

66 AD: Jewish War against Rome

69-96 AD: The Flavian dynasty ruled the Romanian Empire between AD 69 and 96 AD, encompassing the reigns of Vespian (69–79), and his two sons Titus (79–81) and Domition (81–96). The Flavians rose to power during the civil war of 69 AD, known as the Year of the Four Emperors

79-81 AD: Titus was Caesar during this era

50-100 AD: The New Testament, financially sponsored by the Alexander Family, was written during this time period, under Roman-Occupied Flavian Rule

313 AD: The Edict of Milan – During this time period, the Birthday of Sol Invictus once celebrated on December 25th will now be celebrated, within its place, the birth of Jesus Christ, although biblically, the birth of Yahusha Hamaschiach is unknown

325 CE: The Christian doctrine of the Trinity (from the Latin trinus, meaning “threefold”) professes that there is One God, but three eternal and consubstantial persons (aspects): the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The Father is the God of Israel (the Creator God of Genesis), the Son is the historical Jesus of Nazareth and the Holy Spirit is the presence or spirit of God that binds them together. The word ‘trinity’ appears nowhere in neither the Hebrew nor Christian Bible; the concept was finalized at the First Council of Nicaea in 325-390 CE after years of debate. It was an attempt to articulate Christianity’s belief in the oneness of God with their claims about Jesus and their own experiences of the Spirit of God – In other words, the concept of the Holy Trinity is a man-made Pagan ideology, created 300-400 years after the Crucifixion. From another perspective, the Sign of the Trinity was officially activated in order to reconcile or abolish the old adage, as originally derived from the Old Testament: Deuteronomy 6:4 “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One.”… to… Philippians 2:11: “An every tongue shall confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.” So, guess who wrote Philippians? ANSWER: Paul. They couldn’t figure out how to theologically make it plausible to incorporate Jesus as the proverbial son of God, so they incorporated the Pagan Trinity into the mix.

333 AD: Great pilgrimages from France to the holy land was practiced. White Martyrdum of Monastecism was now the trend, and the Father of this invention is St. Anthony, known as the Successor of the Martyrs

390 AD: The expression of the “Apostles’ Creed” is first mentioned in a letter from the Synod of Milan dated AD 390, referring to a belief at the time that each of the Twelve Apostles contributed an article to the twelve articles of the creed. During this era, Classic Christian Orthodoxy began (Note: This is different from the Greek Eastern Orthodox Church, for which was initially started in 33 AD).

EARLY 4TH CENTURY: This is a time when there was a Conflict of Ideologies, between Arius and Athanasius. Arius of Alexandria was a prominent proponent of GOD stating that the essence of GOD cannot be shared even with his son – The Logos; that they are of two substances (Heterousios). But Athanasius states that GOD and Jesus are one of the same (Homoousios) of the same substance; GOD IS ONE… and since GOD IS JESUS AND JESUS IS GOD… only GOD CAN ATONE FOR OUR SINS – GOD IS ONE, according to Athanasius…

354 AD: Bishop Ambrose brought Augustine, from Algeria, to the Christian Faith, whereby Augustine became to be known as St. Augustine

430 AD: Death of Constantine

475 AD: Rome fell. Finally, in 476, the Germanic leader Odoacer staged a revolt and deposed Emperor Romulus Augustulus. From then on, no Roman emperor would ever again rule from a post in Italy, leading many to cite 476 as the year the Western Empire suffered its death blow (Iron)

1054 AD: The Catholic Church branched off of the Eastern Christian Orthodoxy. The Great Schism, as what this literal branching-off has been known to be historically, had split the main faction of Christianity into two divisions, the Roman Catholic and the Eastern Orthodox Church. Today, they remain the two largest denominations of Christianity. On July 16, 1054, this is when the Patriarch of Constantinople Michael Cerularius was ex-communicated from the Christian Orthodoxy, based in Rome, Italy, one of the Five Patriachates, which is the main five establishing roots of the Church Today…

1095 AD: The Crusades

1483 AD: Birth of Martin Luther

1517 AD: The Birth of the Protestant Church – The Protestant Reformation began in Wittenberg, Germany, on October 31, 1517, when Martin Luther, a teacher and a monk, published a document he called “Disputation on the Power of Indulgences, or 95 Theses”. The Protestant Reformation was a religious reform movement that swept through Europe in the 1500s. It resulted in the creation of a branch of Christianity called Protestantism, a name used collectively to refer to the many religious groups that separated from the Roman Catholic Church due to differences in doctrine.

1609-1612 AD: The Baptist Church began and branched from the Protestant Church, and is considered a Protestant Denomination. The first Baptist churches were formed by English-speakers in Holland. They believed, as did Martin Luther, that believers were capable of reading and interpreting the Bible on their own. Modern Baptist churches trace their history to the English Separatist movement in the 1600s, the century after the rise of the original Protestant denominations. This view of Baptist origins has the most historical support and is the most widely accepted

As you can assess from the Timeline above, the root foundation of the Christian Church is derived from the Eastern Greek Orthodoxy (33 AD), since the creation of the first Christian Gentile Church at Antioch (3 AD). Then, between 50-100 AD was when The New Testament was written. Paul died between 62-64 AD, thus Paul had a significant amount of influence in the creation of The New Covenant, especially so within the very beginning of the creation of The New Testament. The Gospels according to Paul, were heavily favored and inspired by Paul’s Roman connections. Following suit, the Flavian Dynasty ruled between 69-96 AD, shortly after Paul’s death. From this, can you see how Flavian rule parallels the period of time when the Christian Bible was actively being written? I must also have to add that there was a very prominent and wealthy family, the Alexanders, whom funded a great deal to this Bible project creation and completion. Not only was The New Testament highly influenced by Roman Rule with the Flavians, but it was also impacted by two powerful families, from the Alexanders to the Herods, who often broke bread with the Romans. And then, this is very important, in that it wasn’t until 325 AD, until the word ‘holy trinity’ was finalized at the First Council of Nicaea after years of debate. It was an attempt to find a common delineation between Christianity’s belief in God, their claims about Jesus and their experiences of the Spirit of God. With this said, the Holy Trinity is a Pagan concept fused into the belief system of the Church not until 300 or so years after the Crucifixion. And I also have to note, that the concept of the Holy Trinity does not exist in the Hebrew Bible, the Tanakh. Always remember, God is One.

“Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one” ~Deuteronomy 6:4


1. Romans

2. Corinthians 1 and 2

3. Galatians

4. Ephesians

5. Philippians

6. Colossians

7. Thessalonians 1 and 2

8. Timothy 1 and 2

9. Titus

10. Philemon

The Eastern Orthodoxy is founded and rooted from Paul, since the creation of the very first Gentile Christian Church, under the influences of Pagan Roman Rule, at Antioch. And till this day, the Orthodoxy still practices pagan ways. Idolatry within the Orthodoxy is religiously practiced. Thus, they idolize their saints. They glorify the goddess and pray to Mother Mary. As in Roman times, the Madonna and Child is prolifically celebrated, another pagan custom. They make pilgrimage’s to tomb sites where they visit mummified body parts of dead saints, and they also glorify the concept of the Holy Trinity. But, not only was I extremely confused about the Trinity (which is truly and ultimately Pagan), another Babylonian element integrated into the very origins of the First Christian Gentile Church, since Antioch, in 3AD; but I was also bewildered to the fact in how Christians would often adamantly declare that the God of the Old Testament is different from the God of the New. Doesn’t this sound like Polytheism to you? Again, this is another quite distinct feature of Paganism (Ancient Babylonia). Listen, the GOD of the Old Covenant is the same as the GOD of the New Testament. To say otherwise, is, not only instilling the practice of Polytheism (Paganism), but also displays a significant portrayal of blasphemy and disrespect to the Eyes of our Almighty Father. Listen, my purpose is to provide the facts to you. And the people’s job is to make a choice as to what GOD you choose to glorify and worship: THE TRUTH… or the fallacy. Just remember, this is nothing new under the sun. Many Christians questioned the authenticity of Paul, even back then during his time, as many with eyes to see and the ears to know, they called him Antichrist! In the next segment, we will talk about this very controversial side of the False Apostle Paul. Now, I’ve used 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12 before as a reference within this article, but I cannot emphasize nor stress enough the importance of this Scripture. Pay special attention to the importance of the word “REBELLION”.


“Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the REBELLION occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God. Don’t you remember that when I was with you I used to tell you these things? And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time. For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way. And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie, and all the ways that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.” ~2 Thessalonians 2:3-12 NIV

“Now, I know specifically that the Book of Thessalonians (from which the passage above is derived from) was written by Paul, but could it be that Paul was talking about himself, per say, without even knowing about it? In many ways, this (in and of itself), is most certainly a conundrum of a mystery, for sure. As you will and (maybe) have already witnessed from the article, if you have already read it, the evidence is mounting severely against the case for Paul. And the Scripture above, not only contributes more to the Hypocrisy within this very case, but also is well-enveloped within the irony of that same Hypocrisy – The Antichrist! This is quite synchronistic to say the least, but according to E.C. Selwyn, a quite pronounced theologian during his day in 1901 (for whom I will exclusively talk about later within this article), makes mention that St. Paul, though he again has never used the term, speaks of a man of sin as if he were himself the Antichrist. And from this, he was making reference to the above passage in Scripture – 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12. Coincidence? -I think not!” ~Ayala Nunez


According to the United Church of God, and I do have to stress a Christian organization, “Marie Sinclair, Countess of Caithness, in her 1876 book Old Truths in a New Light, states: “It is generally, although erroneously, supposed that the doctrine of the Trinity is of Christian origin. Nearly every nation of antiquity possessed a similar doctrine. [The early Catholic theologian] St. Jerome testifies unequivocally, ‘All the ancient nations believed in the Trinity’. Notice how the following quotes document belief in a divine trinity in many regions and religions of the ancient world:

SUMERIA: ‘The universe was divided into three regions each of which became the domain of a god. Anu’s share was the sky. The earth was given to Enlil. Ea became the ruler of the waters. Together they constituted the triad of the Great Gods’ (The Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology, 1994, pp. 54-55)

BABYLONIA: ‘The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god—as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity.’ (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).

INDIA: ‘The Puranas, one of the Hindoo Bibles of more than 3,000 years ago, contain the following passage: ‘O ye three Lords! know that I recognize only one God. Inform me, therefore, which of you is the true divinity, that I may address to him alone my adorations.’ The three gods, Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva [or Shiva], becoming manifest to him, replied, ‘Learn, O devotee, that there is no real distinction between us. What to you appears such is only the semblance. The single being appears under three forms by the acts of creation, preservation, and destruction, but he is one. Hence the triangle was adopted by all the ancient nations as a symbol of the Deity . . . Three was considered among all the pagan nations as the chief of the mystical numbers, because, as Aristotle remarks, it contains within itself a beginning, a middle, and an end. Hence we find it designating some of the attributes of almost all the pagan gods’ (Sinclair, pp. 382-383).

GREECE: ‘In the Fourth Century B.C. Aristotle wrote: ‘All things are three, and thrice is all: and let us use this number in the worship of the gods; for, as the Pythagoreans say, everything and all things are bounded by threes, for the end, the middle and the beginning have this number in everything, and these compose the number of the Trinity.’ (Arthur Weigall, Paganism in Our Christianity, 1928, pp. 197-198).

EGYPT: ‘The Hymn to Amun decreed that No god came into being before him (Amun)’ and that ‘All gods are three: Amun, Re and Ptah, and there is no second to them. Hidden is his name as Amon, he is Re in face, and his body is Ptah.’ . . . This is a statement of trinity, the three chief gods of Egypt subsumed into one of them, Amon. Clearly, the concept of organic unity within plurality got an extraordinary boost with this formulation. Theologically, in a crude form it came strikingly close to the later Christian form of plural Trinitarian monotheism.’ (Simson Najovits, Egypt, Trunk of the Tree, Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 83-84).

OTHER AREAS: ‘Many other areas had their own divine trinities. In Greece they were Zeus, Poseidon and Adonis. The Phoenicians worshipped Ulomus, Ulosuros and Eliun. Rome worshipped Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto. In Germanic nations they were called Wodan, Thor and Fricco. Regarding the Celts, one source states, “The ancient heathen deities of the pagan Irish[,] Criosan, Biosena, and Seeva, or Sheeva, are doubtless the Creeshna [Krishna], Veeshnu [Vishnu], [or the all-inclusive] Brahma, and Seeva [Shiva], of the Hindoos.’ (Thomas Maurice, The History of Hindostan, Vol. 2, 1798, p. 171).

‘Egyptologist Arthur Weigall, while himself a Trinitarian, summed up the influence of ancient beliefs on the adoption of the Trinity doctrine by the Catholic Church in the following excerpt from his previously cited book: ‘It must not be forgotten that Jesus Christ never mentioned such a phenomenon [the Trinity], and nowhere in the New Testament does the word ‘Trinity’ appear. The idea was only adopted by the Church three hundred years after the death of our Lord; and the origin of the conception is entirely pagan.’

‘The ancient Egyptians, whose influence on early religious thought was profound, usually arranged their gods or goddesses in trinities: there was the trinity of Osiris, Isis, and Horus, the trinity of Amen, Mut, and Khonsu, the trinity of Khnum, Satis, and Anukis, and so forth.’

‘The early Christians, however, did not at first think of applying the idea to their own faith. They paid their devotions to God the Father and to Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and they recognized the mysterious and undefined existence of the Holy Spirit; but there was no thought of these three being an actual Trinity, co-equal and united in One (unlike the Tanakh).’

‘The application of this old pagan conception of a Trinity to Christian theology was made possible by the recognition of the Holy Spirit as the required third ‘Person,’ co-equal with the other ‘Persons’

‘The idea of the Spirit being co-equal with God was not generally recognised until the second half of the Fourth Century A.D. . . . In the year 381 the Council of Constantinople added to the earlier Nicene Creed a description of the Holy Spirit as the Lord, and giver of life, who proceedeth from the Father, who with the Father and Son together is worshipped and glorified.’

‘Thus, the Athanasian creed, which is a later composition but reflects the general conceptions of Athanasius [the 4th-century Trinitarian whose view eventually became official doctrine] and his school, formulated the conception of a co-equal Trinity wherein the Holy Spirit was the third ‘Person’; and so it was made a dogma of the faith, and belief in the Three in One and One in Three became a paramount doctrine of Christianity, though not without terrible riots and bloodshed.’

‘Today a Christian thinker . . . has no wish to be precise about it, more especially since the definition is obviously pagan in origin and was not adopted by the Church until nearly three hundred years after Christ” (pp. 197-203).’

‘James Bonwick summarized the story well on page 396 of his 1878 work Egyptian Belief and Modern Thought: ‘It is an undoubted fact that more or less all over the world the deities are in triads. This rule applies to eastern and western hemispheres, to north and south. Further, it is observed that, in some mystical way, the triad of three persons is one. The first is as the second or third, the second as first or third, the third as first or second; in fact, they are each other, ONE and of the same individual being.’” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE


According to Jeffrey Daugherty, author of the book, Apostle Paul Antichrist, Paul is essentially the Roman name for which was either given to him or for which Paul, himself, had entitled upon to himself. Regardless, Paul’s former name was Hebrew – Sha’ul of Tarsus. And interesting to note, as well, is that Sha’ul of Tarsus means literally “The Man from Hell”. Additionally, semantically speaking (at its root), Sha’ul is Sheol, which also means “The Gate to the Underworld”, in Hebrew. Now, it makes you think as to why Sha’ul of Tarsus changed his name, as no-one else would dare to question his new Roman name, Paul, correct? (1:31:30) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE


But how interesting to note that when I deep-dived into the history of the Greek Orthodoxy, the same flavor of New Age paganism still existed within its very infrastructure, in theology, belief and practice. From this, regardless, I learned much about the beginnings of the first Pagan Gentile Church at Antioch. From there, the investigation started with my research into Bible study, and this is when Paul came into question. Much of his epistles contradicted Yahusha’s teachings. And so, to explain myself in disagreement against Paul (as a person, his heresy, and in his self-righteousness), I have found that I repetitively repeated myself over and over and over again, the same explanation, as to why Paul is so very flawed, to many offended Christians of the faith, and thus this is the main reason why I am writing this article. But, I understand, this is exactly how I felt when I was exposed the same to this Revelation. Though, this is nothing new under the sun, within the mere fact that Paul was considered to be the Antichrist, this was already a known fact, even during Paul’s time, and even more so historically thereafter.

According to Robert Mt. Sion, in his book Paul the Antichrist and the Invention of Christianity, Robert states, “When a Christian hears that there could be a potential Truth that Paul could literally be the Antichrist, from this statement alone, the average Christian would immediately respond by saying: ‘Who in their right mind could ever think of such a terrible thing, concerning St. Paul?’ Through our history many have questioned the writings of ‘St. Paul’ and questioned his authority to speak for Jesus, seeing how he never met him or heard him teach. What distinguishes Jesus’ teaching is that he taught and practiced the Jewish Torah and taught his disciples about a ‘narrow road and a narrow gate that very few would find in order to have eternal life’, by denying themselves and taking up their cross and following him. In contrast, Paul taught his Gentile disciples that the Torah was abolished by Jesus and that ‘broad was the road and wide was the gate that led to salvation’ and many would enter and be saved by following him [Paul]. We are confronted here with two distinct gospels: one that the apostles of Jesus received directly from him and another ‘new gospel’ that Paul claims to have received by a private revelation from Jesus himself; one, the ‘gospel of grace’ which today many people believe and many follow, and the other, the ‘gospel of the kingdom’ which very few have received and have followed.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

Now, the following older inference that I will provide for you, in the next segment, is an excerpt from E.C. Selwyn’s article, entitled St. Paul Identified with Antichrist by the Jews. This writing was published within a book, called The Biblical World (1901), Volume 18, Issue 1. E.C. Selwyn is a turn-of-the-century author of many books, a prolific writer and theologian from where he has based most of his written work within the category of history, biography and Biblical Prophecy. Now, as you read this excerpt from the very pages of E.C. Selwyn’s article, you will be, not only shocked, but quite intrigued to witness the remarkable parallels that Selwyn creates between Paul, the Antichrist and the description provided for you in the Book of Daniel. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

“It seems clear that the point of mentioning an ‘old-fashioned’ disciple as providing entertainment for St. Paul and St. Luke on the way to Jerusalem is this: St. Paul represented the new fashion in prophecy, the new ideas which be-and Barnabas bad set forth at the Council of Jerusalem some eight years before, the new and much larger faith which opened the door of faith (Acts 14:27) to the Gentiles without entrance through the door. This seemed at first to be a dangerous doctrine. Perhaps the danger might be lessened if their host adhered to the ‘old-fashioned’ opinion and would at the same time vouch for his guests. This amount of guarantee, how- ever, proved quite inadequate; and James accordingly now propounded his almost fatal plan, whereby St. Paul should as it were appease the rage of ‘the wild beast’ by putting his head into its mouth.

Paul’s marvellous faith in God’s providence and purpose towards him, his absolute humility and consideration for others, and his willingness to submit to the judgement of others, more conclusively that his compliance with James’s advice. Looking back upon the circumstances now, especially through the mild atmosphere of the historian of the Acts, we can see how the true colouring of God’s purpose has mellowed the lurid passions of the Jews, who would have torn the Apostle in pieces in the Temple Court.

JAMES MUST HAVE KNOWN SOMETHING OF THE ANTICHRIST. He must have known that, just as Messiah was an all-pervading dream of the Jews of that preceding century, so too was the ANTICHRIST EXPERIENCED AS A DREAM, an almost universal dream, a dream that fiercely haunted many of the Jews, and haunted some of them more closely than did that of Messiah. Their minds would be full of him; and some who could not rise high enough in the moral scale to thrill with the joyful hope and aspiration for a personal Son of Man, could very well summon up a fiery and patriotic indignation that would storm forth against so devilish a thought as the ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION spoken of by Daniel the Prophet standing where it ought not in the Temple of the Most High.

Now just as the dream of a Messiah took many different forms in different minds, so did the dream of an Antichrist. In the mind of John of Ephesus, since the term Antichrist is not mentioned in the Apocalypse, we can hardly say that it designated Rome. But the idea is essentially that ROME OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE WAS ANTICHRIST. St. Paul himself, though he again has never used the term, SPEAKS OF THE MAN OF SIN AS IF HE WERE THE ANTICHRIST, and he takes the exactly opposite view to John in that he regards Rome as the beneficent controlling power which restrains Antichrist at present, while John in his indignation at the Emperor- worship under Nero regards Rome as the Church’s deadliest foe. The true Roman citizen, who was also Jew by birth and training and Christian by conviction, would have been grievously vexed with the Ephesian seer’s outburst against Rome. It is hardly too much to say that had Paul the Aged survived to read the Apocalypse it would have broken his heart. He was spared that piercing thrust, that ‘wounding in the house of his friends’.

If all this difference of opinion could exist between two New Testament writers on the subject of Antichrist, it is plain that no less difference would reign among different Jewish minds. There is an equal difference between the charges brought against St. Paul by the Jews in different places. When it suited them they could, as at Thessalonica, accuse him of ‘acting contrary to the decrees of Cesar, saying that there is another king, Jesus.’ Yet at Antioch in Pisidia the Jews, ‘filled with jealousy,’ had ‘urged on the devout women of honourable estate’ (Acts 13:45,50), presumably on high scriptural grounds of the Old Testament. At Corinth (Acts 18:13) again the Jews had alleged the injury done by Paul to the Mosaic Law. At Ephesus (Acts 19:13) they complained of his injuring their trade in magic. Now it is certain that there were Jews in Ephesus, as everywhere else, who held strongly the belief in Antichrist.

NOWHERE WAS THE BOOK OF DANIEL MORE CLOSELY STUDIED! Nowhere was there a more fruitful crop of Messianic literature. Nowhere were persons more awake for Judaism than in the birthplace of the Apocalypse of John. Ephesus is the origin or a prophetic writer who within a few years of the time which we are considering was to invoke his countrymen thus: ‘And thou, Asia, that art joined in heart to the splendour of Babylon (Rome), and art the glory of her person, woe be unto thee, thou wretch, because thou hast made thyself like unto her. Therefore, saith God, I will send plagues upon thee, widowhood, poverty, famine, sword, and pestilence.’ At the same time he could address his readers in language which bears an unmistakable resemblance to our Apocalypse itself, and yet is Jewish without being Christian.

The Ephesian or Asiatic Jews-for of course ‘Asiatic’ means of the Roman Province of Asia-would bear at this time a special grudge against St. Paul personally. At the tumult at Ephesus (Acts 19:33) they had put forward Alexander, in order if possible, to prove to the excited mob that the Jews were not to be saddled with the offenses of this apostate Pharisee, Saul of Tarsus. They failed, and they doubtless had suffered in consequence since. But above all they were infuriated by his teaching. Had he not himself said to the Thessalonians that there was to be a great ‘apostasy’ (2 Thessalonians 2) before Antichrist came? ‘Anathema!’ – they would say; ‘He is the apostate himself; he teacheth men to believe that Jesus is the Christ; HE MAKETH THE LAW OF MOSES TO BE OF OF NONE EFFECT; he ceaseth not to speak against the Holy Place; he saith that the Jew bath no advantage; that Abraham bath nothing whereof to glory ; that circumcision is nothing, THAT THE JEW IS ABOLISHED.’ They plotted to take his life at Cenchrea, and thought they were doing God service, for was it not written in the Book of Daniel (Daniel 11:21,25,26). ‘And in his place shall stand up a contemptible person, to whom they shall not give the glory of a king; but he shall come in suddenly, and obtain the kingdom by lottery (or inheritance, but in the Chaldee, flatteries). But he shall not stand, for a device shall be devised against him.’ Had not St. Paul’s weak bodily presence and contemptible power of speech been already criticised by the Corinthian objectors (2 Corinthians 10:10)? Had not St. Paul preached much about the ‘inheritance of the Saints’ and their lot? Had he not been already accused of preaching the Kingdom by flatteries, as he admitted himself when he wrote to the Galatians. “Am I now persuading men, or God, or am I seeking to please men?” (Galatians 1:10). Had he not enlarged in preaching about the ‘lot of inheritance (Acts 23)? It would be easy for Asiatic Jews to see in many of his actions and doctrines the fulfilment of ancient prophecy. And it was easy to find more than forty resolute Jews who should fore- cast devices against him, in other words, plot his destruction. For there is no wind to fan the fanatical flame so strong as a popular belief in the fulfilment of prophecy

THE PROPHECIES IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL continued: ‘And strong arms shall stand on his part” (Daniel 11:31). Well, the STRONG ARM OF THE LAW OF ROME HAD PROTECTED HIM once and again against the spluttering fury of the Jews, at Corinth and at Ephesus (Acts 18:16-40). Only one step more was needed; it was that he should be found standing in the Temple of God.’ And they shall pollute the sanctuary of awe, and shall take away the daily sacri-fice” (Acts 21:28). Precisely so. Saul, they would say, is abolishing the sacrifice by introducing the polluted heathen into the Temple, where he had as a fact himself entered in order to make the offerings prescribed in the Law (Numbers 6: 13-20). ‘And they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.’ It was written – ‘He shall honour with gold and silver a god whom his fathers did not know.’ (Daniel 11:38). ‘A Kingdom of Gentiles shall corrupt the city and the Holy Place with the Messiah (Daniel 9:26-27) – just what Saul of Tarsus was doing, in bringing the offerings, so long and carefully collected from the Gentile Churches, to aid the poor Saints in Jerusalem in the name of Messiah! – ‘And in the end of the week there shall be removed the sacrifice and the libation.’ (Daniel 9:35). ‘And some of them of understanding shall devise for purifying themselves’ (Acts 21-26); exactly what St. Paul was doing in the Temple. Now they had watched for him day after day, and he had been seen in the Temple, at the altar, and his four ragged men with him. What were these four? Were they not also the FOUR HORNS TOWARDS THE FOUR WINDS OF HEAVEN SPOKEN OF ALSO BY DANIEL THE PROPHET? And what was their poor ragged appearance but a crafty disguise of Beelzebub? For ‘the four bruised ones were not according to their real strength.’ (Daniel 8:8,22). And what was Saul doing but confirming his diabolic covenant for one week? And what was he about to do but to stop the sacrifice and overspread the abomination of desolation? They must not wait the full seven days, or they would be too late. So when the ‘seven days were almost ended, they stirred up the people and took forcible hold of him.’ (Acts 21:27)

The conclusion, the wild conviction and certainty that the Jews would draw from these coincidences, was that SAUL OF TARSUS WAS AN ANTICHRIST HIMSELF! Swiftly enough the rumour flew from mouth to mouth. And no wonder that they cried, “Away with him!” There was for them no other way of dealing with ‘THE MAN OF LAWLESSNESS WHO OPPOSED THE LAW OF MOSES’ – THE MAN OF SIN! THE SON OF PERDITION!’” ~E.C. Selwyn, St. Paul Identified with Antichrist by the Jews, The Biblical World (1901)


The entire New Testament is severely biased towards the writings of Paul. According to former Protestant Pastor and author of his Best-Selling Book, Apostle Paul Antichrist, Jeffrey Daugherty makes a very important point in stating that, “What the New Testament really is… is an ancient form of today’s Twitter Battle, where people, are constantly engaging each other, literally debating back and forth. Except, back then in those days, they were doing this with letters, so-called epistles. Originally, how it was done back then, there was a specific order in how these letters or books were originally laid-out between the Disciples and the Supporters of the Disciples against the epistles of Paul. But how the Modern Day Bible is arranged today is specifically biased towards Paul, and not the other way around. When the books of the Disciples and the Supporters of the Disciples are put together in the modern day version, as it may obviously seem, it is generally a group of writings slapped together, possessing no particular rhyme nor reason (36:50) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

In other words, they are merely a “hodge-podge” of essays and/or letters of which were truly intended to be responses to Paul’s overtly-intrusive banter, his formulative epistles, as from what you can see here from this visual chronological list, as portrayed by the current Christian Holy Bible today:

1. Matthew

2. Mark

3. Luke

4. John

5. Acts*

6. Romans*

7. Corinthians*

8. Galatians*

9. Ephesians*

10. Philippians*

11. Colossians*

12. Thessalonians*

13. Timothy

14. Titus

15. Philemon

16. Hebrews

17. James

18. Peter

19. John

20. Revelation

Now, if you have already read The New Testament, and you already know what is presently written as the content for each book, then you clearly understand that there is no organization nor flow from one book to the other in transition. To the non-reader, this list of names… is just exactly that… just a list of names with no meaning. So, in order to be a part of the discussion, please read your Bible, ladies and gentlemen! But, on the other hand, when we speak about Paul and his epistles, there is a considerable flow and quite an organized ritualization to his thoughts. If you are to truly analyze the chronology of letters (epistles) between the True Apostles and the False Apostle Paul, you will begin to realize that Paul’s letters are more sequential, thus following a smoother flow of thought, whilst the other books between the Original Disciples and the supporters of the Apostles possess no true sequential order nor timeline.

But if we are to organize these epistles according to the appropriate order between the Disciples and the Supporters of the Disciples and the epistles of Paul, according to Jeffrey Daugherty, then you will start to see more of a harmonious flow between the conversations, back and forth. Thus, to the contrary, the New Testament should have been restructured according to the following, more practical and efficient sequence, for better understanding:

1. James

2. Thessalonians*

3. Corinthians*

4. Galatians*

5. Mark

6. Romans*

7. Peter

8. Philemon

9. Colossians*

10. Ephesians*

11. Philippians*

12. Luke

13. Acts*

14. Jude

15. Matthew

16. Timothy

17. Titus

18. Hebrews

19. John

20. Revelation

As you can see through this visual, you can now clearly ascertain a much more precise flow between the books, if only it were sequenced in such a way.

And this is the reason why I will also complement this article with a visual podcast video, from QMR 2.0: The New Age Recovery Chronicles, with main intent for the reader and/or examiner to follow this article word-for-word and step-by-step (within the analysis) according to what I can provide for you, in tandem with that of a video broadcast. Some people are visual learners, others clearly opposite, and then some of whom like to integrate both.


So, what does this tell us as the reader? This tells us that the Romans favored Paul. The Christian Bible is a Roman-influenced work for which there was a behind-the-scenes arrangement involved between Rome and Paul to start a New Religion of which would, not only control the rising popularity of growing numbers following this movement in the Messiah, but also to plagiarize and Hellenize the Original Hebraic Text (Tanakh) and to incorporate Paul’s New Christology of the Alchemical Mind of Christ. This is Paganism, Mysticism and Hypocrisy at its most evil, manipulative and deceptive! Judas was merely a distraction behind what HaSatan was truly planning with Paul, which is based upon a doctrine entirely against the original teachings of Christ and of the LAW OF GOD. And as we are to break it down, anything that goes against the LAW OF GOD, is Anti-GOD, and anything of which goes against Christ, is Anti-Christ!

Kenneth Humphreys is a British scholar and activist, writer, radio broadcaster, and public speaker. He studied for five years at university, graduating with a master’s degree in history and social sciences. Humphreys has appeared on numerous TV and radio shows, has debated many Christian apologists, and was a contributing scholar in the documentary Caesar’s Messiah and was the guest speaker at the International Mythicist Conference in Athens in May 2016. According to Kenneth Humphreys, the creation of The New Testament was done with Paul in mind as the central influence and figure relegated to this Hellenized text. The New Testament is all about Paul and his epistles. Essentially, the New Testament is more about the Gospel of Paul, and not the Teachings of Yahusha Hamaschiach (Jesus Christ). (5:15) CLICK HERE TO WATCH THIS VIDEO

As previously mentioned, Paul was favored by the establishment, the Romans. And this was quite clear, as evidenced within the following passage in Scripture, Acts 21:27-40:

But before we bring in the Book of Acts, I would like to prepare for you the conditions of what this passage in Scripture entails. Thus, from with one of the provinces in Asia, Roman soldiers allowed Paul (who was a captive prisoner at the time) to address a crowd, in a foreign language, no less! As to the very conditions present within that moment, the angry Jewish crowd were essentially within minutes of stoning Paul to death. But, Roman soldiers intervened and protected one of their most valuable assets, Paul, who was not only merely a prisoner, but also a double agent for the Romans, placed into protective custody. And as this violent crowd begins to stir even wilder uncontrolled, whilst spreading word amongst and between each other of Paul’s blasphemous dealings involved with pitting gentiles and Jews against the LAW OF GOD, this clammering of sorts, grows from whispers and chatterings to that of a sudden uproar, as leaders from amidst the crowd continue to feed it rising intensity with following vernacular: “Fellow Israelites, help us! This is the man who teaches everyone everywhere against our people and our law and this place. And besides, he has brought Greeks into the temple and defiled this holy place!”

“When the seven days were nearly over, some Jews from the province of Asia saw Paul at the temple. They stirred up the whole crowd and seized him, shouting, ‘Fellow Israelites, help us! This is the man who teaches everyone everywhere against our people and our law and this place. And besides, he has brought Greeks into the temple and defiled this holy place (They had previously seen Trophimus the Ephesian in the city with Paul and assumed that Paul had brought him into the temple)’. The whole city was aroused, and the people came running from all directions. Seizing Paul, they dragged him from the temple, and immediately the gates were shut. While they were trying to kill him, news reached the commander of the Roman troops that the whole city of Jerusalem was in an uproar. He at once took some officers and soldiers and ran down to the crowd. When the rioters saw the commander and his soldiers, they stopped beating Paul. The commander came up and arrested him and ordered him to be bound with two chains. Then he asked who he was and what he had done. Some in the crowd shouted one thing and some another, and since the commander could not get at the truth because of the uproar, he ordered that Paul be taken into the barracks. When Paul reached the steps, the violence of the mob was so great he had to be carried by the soldiers. The crowd that followed kept shouting, ‘Get rid of him!’ As the soldiers were about to take Paul into the barracks, he asked the commander, ‘May I say something to you?’ ‘Do you speak Greek?’ he replied. ‘Aren’t you the Egyptian who started a revolt and led four thousand terrorists out into the wilderness some time ago?’ Paul answered, ‘I am a Jew, from Tarsus in Cilicia, a citizen of no ordinary city. Please let me speak to the people.’ After receiving the commander’s permission, Paul stood on the steps and motioned to the crowd. When they were all silent, he said to them in Aramaic.” ~Acts 21:27-40



During the Apostle Paul’s time, it was very well-known among his peers and within the community that Paul lied frequently when referencing Old Testament Scripture. The man not only declared himself to be a liar, but boasted about his deceptive ways and wore them like a badge of honour!


Now, if one person states that he is specifically declaring to you that he is not a liar (like say the first two times), then fine, it’s a little cute; but if the same person continues to state this over-and-over-and-over-again, then you personally possess no other choice, but to doubt the repetitive dealings of that very person, in personally thinking in the back of your mind, “Hey, is this guy really lying to me!” – can this be true? What kind of person who repeatedly has to declare to others, let alone the world here in Scripture, that he or she is “not lying?” ANSWER: A Liar! Here are a few passages in Scripture which makes reference to this very exact point, such as this within the case for Paul. As a side note, just remember, Paul wrote the books of Romans, Corinthians, Galatians, and Timothy (30:40): CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

“I say the truth in Christ, I LIE NOT, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost.” ~Romans 9:1

“The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I LIE NOT.” ~2 Corinthians 11:31

“Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I LIE NOT.” ~Galatians 1:20

“And for this purpose I was appointed a herald and an apostle. I am telling the truth, I AM NOT LYING–and a true and faithful teacher of the Gentiles.” ~1 Timothy 2:7 NIV

Now, to bring things more down to perspective as to how serious this is, in Romans 3:7 (KJV), Paul declares that he is FREE TO LIE on the basis that the end justifies the means: “For if the truth of God hath more abounded through MY LIE unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?

In other words, Paul is saying, provided God’s truthfulness shines through, then it doesn’t matter if I LIE to ensure this happens. Since I am lying for the purpose of bringing glory to God, it was all done in the name of the Lord. “That justifies my actions, therefore I have not committed a sin.” So, if this man is conclusively a liar, then is it fair to say, that whatever happened to Paul, at Demascus, really even happened, at all, if his lie indeed was used to justify a means – to start a new religion under the Gospel according Paul, none abiding by the Gospels, true to the Messiah, Yahusha Hamaschiach? In the next segment, I will cover more in-depth about Paul’s experiences in supposedly encountering Yahusha from within the spirit at Demascus, but for the meantime, we focus on his lies…

HERE’S ANOTHER DECLARATION IN SCRIPTURE BY PAUL (ADMITTING TO LIES): “Be that as it may, I have not been a burden to you. Yet, a CRAFTY fellow that I am, I caught you by TRICKERY!” 2 Corinthians 12:16 NIV

Additionally, a close examination of the New Testament reveals three instances where Paul appears to have told lies in order to support his argument or position of his time. Now, there are many Biblical references, but I will only focus upon a few examples. I don’t want to over-inundate you with too much TRUTH, for the meaning of this article could possess the possible propensity to be overtly-drowned by the overwhelming evidence against Paul, if not already.

According to Numbers 23:19 KJV, Scripture clearly states, “God is not a man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it.”

And, in Mathew 5:18 NIV, the Word of God states, “For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.”

Steve Yarrow is the Adult Groups and Discipleship Pastor at Pinelake Church in Mississippi. Prior to serving at Pinelake, Steve had served as the Small Groups Pastor at Northridge Church near Detroit, and the Adult Ministries Pastor at Christ Community Church in St. Charles, Illinois. John also consults with churches around the nation on various aspects of small groups. Steve has a Master’s of Theology from Dallas Theological Seminary. According to Steven Yarrow, three eye-opening indicators are found to support strong evidence for the prominence of Paul’s lies, not only in self-declaration as supported previously, but also to that, from the damning evidence found within Scripture: (1) Paul’s meeting with the Jerusalem Council (2) Paul’s lies presented to the Sanhedrin (3) Paul’s meeting with King Agrippa CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

As stated above, the first of Paul’s lies, according to Steven Yarrow, relates to a meeting Paul had with the Jerusalem Council:

“First, it is imperative that we understand the subject matter of the book of Galatians. Christianity fondly refers to Galatians as ‘The Magna Carta of spiritual emancipation.’ One reference states, ‘It remains as the abiding monument of the liberation of Christianity from the trammels of legalism.’ It is evident to the reader of Galatians that Paul’s position against the Law is quite hostile. His intention is to convince the Galatian believers not to give the time of day to the ‘Judaizers’ like Peter who were teaching the Law of Moses including circumcision. In fact, he twice commands the Galatians to curse anyone who teaches anything other than his doctrine (Galatians 1:8,9). Among his many anti-Torah/Law arguments are these specific quotes:

‘For, by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified.’ ~Galatians 2:16.

‘But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident.’ ~Galatians 3:11.

Yet Deuteronomy 6:25 rebuffs these statements when Moses states: ‘Then it will be righteousness for us, if we are careful to observe all these commandments before the Lord our God, as He has commanded us.’

From this, Paul declares: ‘Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law.’ ~Galatians 3:13.

But Deuteronomy (along with Jesus about everything Jesus taught about the Law) does not portray it a curse, nor does it of itself bring one. Rather, breaking the law brings a curse. Therefore it is man and not the Law that is the problem.

Yet Paul declares, ‘Indeed I, Paul, say to you that if you become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing. And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is a debtor to keep the whole law. You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by the law; you have fallen from grace.’ ~Galatians 5:2-4.

Here he even drops his own name before telling the Galatians a severe doctrinal lie. ‘For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even this: You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ ~Galatians 5:14.

This is in fact only the second greatest commandment, as Mathew 22:36-40 states, ‘Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law? And, Jesus said unto him, You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind’. This is the first and the great commandment. And the second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.

And on these two commandments, hang all the law and the prophets.’ 1 John 5:3 describes how we are to fulfill the first and greatest commandment to love God with all our heart: ‘For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments. And His commandments are not burdensome.’ Note, John is not referring to the teachings of Jesus, rather he is referring to the commandments of God (which is the Law) and for which Jesus declared would not pass away until Heaven and Earth passes away. Yet, Paul states that the Law no longer has relevance, as it was only given as a ‘shadow of things to come’.

Another lie, the second most prominent, greatly attributed to Paul, is when Paul was arrested in the temple during his last visit to Jerusalem, when he had to be rescued by the Romans. On the following day the Roman commander allowed Paul to be taken before Ananias the high priest and the Sanhedrin to defend himself against the charges he was up on. During this trial of sorts, Paul makes an interesting claim: But when Paul perceived that one part were Sadducees and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, ‘Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee; concerning the hope and resurrection of the dead I am being judged!’ ~Acts 23:6,7 NKJV.

And when he had said this, a dissension arose between the Pharisees and the Sadducees; and the assembly was divided. A close examination of the facts here show it was but a divide-and-conquer ploy, in which there was not one shred of truth. For Paul to say he was being judged on the issue of the resurrection of the dead… was an outright lie.

The truth concerning why he was arrested is recorded a little earlier in Acts: ‘The Jews from Asia, seeing him in the temple, stirred up the whole crowd and laid hands on him, crying out, Men of Israel, help! This is the man who teaches all men everywhere against the people, the law, and this place.’ ~Acts 21:27,28 NKJV.

The truth is that Paul was being judged on the matter of bringing to nothing the importance of Israel, the Law of Moses, and the temple. Paul claimed he was being judged on his view of the resurrection not because it was the truth, but for the purpose of dividing his accusers against each other.

And the third most prominent lie, attributed to Paul, were his lies towards King Agrippa, in the recounting of his conversion experience on the road to Damascus! The story of Paul’s conversion on the road to Damascus is recorded three separate times in the book of Acts:

The first is in Acts 9:3-19 as documented by the author of the book, Luke. The highlights are: And as he journeyed he came near Damascus, and suddenly a light shone around him from heaven. Then he fell to the ground, and heard a voice saying to him, ‘Saul Saul, why are you persecuting Me?’ And he said, ‘Who are You, Lord?’ And the Lord said, ‘I am Yeshua, whom you are persecuting, It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’ So he, trembling and astonished, said, ‘Lord, what do You want me to do?’ And the Lord said to him, ‘Arise and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.’

The second account of Paul’s conversion on the road to Damascus lies in Acts 22:6-15 and here, Luke records Paul’s personal account of his experience as given before the angry Jews in Jerusalem. The points of interest here are: ‘Now it happened, as I journeyed and came near Damascus at about noon, suddenly a great light from heaven shone around me. And I fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to me, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?’ So I answered, ‘Who are You, Lord?’ And he said to me, ‘I am Yeshua of Nazareth, Whom you are persecuting.’ …So I said, ‘What shall I do, Lord?’ And the Lord said to me, ‘Arise and go into Damascus, and there you will be told all things which are appointed for you to do.’

NOTE: There is no real problem or conflict in these first two accounts. Even with the slight variations, the main points remain basically the same. The fact is, they are quite consistent and corroborate each other.

The third record of Paul’s conversion experience is again given by Paul himself in his own defense before King Agrippa in Acts 26:12-19. Here is what he had to say: “While thus occupied, as I journeyed to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests, at midday, O king, along the road I saw a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, shining around me and those who journeyed with me. And when we all had fallen to the ground, I heard a voice speaking to me and saying in the Hebrew language, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’ So I said, ‘Who are You , Lord?’ And he said, ‘I am Yeshua, whom you are persecuting. But rise and stand on your feet; for I have appeared to you for this purpose, to make you a minister and a witness both of the things which you have seen and of the things which I will yet reveal to you. I will deliver you from the Jewish people, as well as from the Gentiles, to whom I now send you, to open their eyes and to turn them from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who are sanctified by faith in Me.’ Therefore, ‘King Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision.’

According to what Luke and Paul himself had previously testified, when asked by Jesus what he was to do, he was told to do absolutely nothing other than to “go to Damascus, and there you would be told ‘all things’ you were to do”. But going to Damascas and waiting on a visit from Ananias who would tell him what he should do… didn’t fit the story Paul wanted Agrippa to hear – that he received nothing from people, but everything from the Lord himself in a vision.

NOTE: So Paul changes his story and tells Agrippa that he specifically receives his instructions on what to do, and received his charge to be the apostle to the Gentiles right there on the road to Damascus!

This is not just a simple case of information having been left out of the first two accounts. The story has been changed totally to support the argument he was pitting to Agrippa – that he was God appointed and that no man had any involvement in delivering that appointment. That he had to grope around in a state of blindness put on him by God, and to be at the mercy of some unknown Christian who had to be sent to him, and who eventually had to ‘led him to the Lord’ just didn’t make the cut here, so the truth was substituted with a lie. Paul could have just not mentioned about Ananius and the role he played in his ‘conversion’, but Paul wanted to paint a picture for King Agrippa of what he believed to be his unavoidable destiny, so he embellished his account of his vision with a lie.

FINAL NOTE: So, as you can see from the Scriptural evidence, Paul repetitively makes it a considerable habit of practice to changing his story in order to fit the occasion, which complements his own agenda, to have his own way. From here, it appears that Paul did this (to lie) ever so subtly to impress upon King Agrippa’s mind the picture that it was his destiny to be delivered from the Jews, as was already the case, and the Gentiles. By saying God had told him He was going to deliver him from both the Jews and Gentiles, Paul was warning Agrippa in no uncertain terms that he would have God to answer to if he released Paul on this occasion. It was all a lie, and the lie worked – from that time on, Paul never was delivered from the Gentiles, even though under Roman law he could have and should have been.

A little later in the story, Festus and Agrippa mock Paul (Acts 26:24,28) and come to the conclusion that Paul was little more than a harmless crackpot. This is when Paul opts for making an appeal to Caesar for justice in the matter. Christianity has generally thought of Paul’s appeal to Caesar as a brilliant tactical move. But one quote is conveniently overlooked. It is recorded that King Agrippa said to Festus, ‘This man might have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar.’ ~Acts 26:32. Paul might have been a liar, but he certainly wasn’t stupid!” ~Steven Yarrow, Colours of My Life: Reflections of a Baby Boomer CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE


According to Jeffrey Daugherty, once more, Bible scholar, twenty year licensed minister, and the author of his book, Apostle Paul Antichrist, “The story of Paul’s conversion from a devout Jew, violently persecuting believers in Jesus, to a devout Christian, fearlessly spreading the Gospel against all opposition, is found four times in Acts (NOTE: but I could only find three). And these three stories differ tremendously.” (7:05) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

FIRST ACCOUNT: “And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest. And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem. And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. AND THE MEN WHICH JOURNEYED WITH HIM STOOD SPEECHLESS, HEARING A VOICE, BUT SEEING NO MAN. And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus. And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink. And there was a certain disciple at Damascus, named Ananias; and to him said the Lord in a vision, Ananias. And he said, Behold, I am here, Lord. And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the street which is called Straight, and enquire in the house of Judas for one called Saul, of Tarsus: for, behold, he prayeth.” ~Acts 9:1-11 KJV

AUTHOR’S NOTE: As a side note, and this is only me, but doesn’t this account sound like Joseph Smith and the beginnings of the Mormon Church? So, in both beginnings from both establishments, both men miraculously receive Revelation in either the form of a disk or a bright light, and then here we have it – the beginning of two new religions! Essentially, Paul, Sha’ul of Tarsus, is the more ancient rendition of Joseph Smith and his Mormon Church. From this, does this strike even more question concerning the growing fallacies of Paul? Regardless, in continuing on, the first account, all the men who were with Paul heard the “voice”, but did not see the “man”. Although, in the second account, the men with him (on the other hand) did not hear the “voice”, but they could see the “light”. Could it be that the men recanted their stories? (7:05) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

SECOND ACCOUNT: “Men, brethren, and fathers, hear ye my defence which I make now unto you (And when they heard that he spake in the Hebrew tongue to them, they kept the more silence: and he saith). I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, and taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day. And I persecuted this way unto the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women. As also the high priest doth bear me witness, and all the estate of the elders: from whom also I received letters unto the brethren, and went to Damascus, to bring them which were there bound unto Jerusalem, for to be punished. And it came to pass, that, as I made my journey, and was come nigh unto Damascus about noon, suddenly there shone from heaven a great light round about me. And I fell unto the ground, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And I answered, Who art thou, Lord? And he said unto me, I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest. AND THEY THAT WERE WITH ME SAW INDEED THE LIGHT, AND WERE AFRAID; BUT THEY HEARD NOT THE VOICE of him that spake to me. And I said, What shall I do, Lord? And the Lord said unto me, Arise, and go into Damascus; and there it shall be told thee of all things which are appointed for thee to do. And when I could not see for the glory of that light, being led by the hand of them that were with me, I came into Damascus.” ~Acts 22:1-11 KJV

AUTHOR’S NOTE: In the third account at Demascus (below), there is no specific note made mention by Paul on whether the men who was with him even heard or even saw anything. As you can see, between the three passages, there is a tremendous inconsistency here within the text. For someone who continues to state over-and-over again in Scripture “that he is not lying”, well, Paul didn’t think too much about making sure his stories matched and line-up either. Eyewitness accounts are very important to ensuring the validly and legitimacy of any story told. And from the evidence that is presented to you, within this article, the credibility of Paul’s actions and words do not parallel the characteristics of one who should be appointed as an Apostle.

THIRD ACCOUNT: “Whereupon as I went to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests, At midday, O king, I SAW IN THE LIGHT FROM HEAVEN, ABOVE THE BRIGHTNESS OF THE SUN, SHINING ROUND ABOUT ME AND THEM WHICH JOURNEYED WITH ME. And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest. But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee; Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee, To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. 19Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision: But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judæa, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance. For these causes the Jews caught me in the temple, and went about to kill me. Having therefore obtained help of God, I continue unto this day, witnessing both to small and great, saying none other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should come: That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles.” ~Acts 26:12-23


As a Psychiatry Nurse, for over 20 years, I have worked with several clients, too many to name, within the world of Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Health Management, with a wide consortium of varying types of psychiatric diagnosis and Personality Disorders, so I am quite significantly familiar with Mental Illness, especially in varying Personality Disorders, not only well-versed book-wise, but also by working with hundreds diagnosed with Personality Disorder. And from the great deal of supporting evidence concerning the clinical psychiatric side of things concerning the mental condition and psychiatric state of Paul, there is a significant amount of evidence building-up within this article where the bulk of lying exhibited within Scripture, in the case of Paul, contributes greatly to signs and symptoms of a clinical pathology – Pseudologia Fantastica (PATHOLOGICAL LYING), among a few other traits. And if you had already forgotten, just let me remind you that Paul was never officially appointed as a true Apostle from Yahusha. Paul declared himself the title of Apostle, rather (SELF-ENTITLEMENT). Regardless, Paul believed that it was he, and only he, and not Yahusha’s Disciples who had received the real Truth about Jesus, as he (Paul) met the “spiritual” Jesus, instead, with no need to meet the physical true-to-life Jesus, himself (NARCISSISM & HYPOCRITICAL THINKING). Furthermore, Paul felt that, although the original Apostles knew and spoke with the physical Jesus, in the flesh, it mattered not to him. It was the spiritual Jesus which held more weight than the actual physical Jesus, once more, within the flesh. And, plus, didn’t Paul make that declaration three times in the Book of Acts (although significantly varying in storyline from each other) that he saw a bright light shine from the Heavens (DELUSIONAL AND HALLUCINATIVE THINKING)? Although this experience could hold a double meaning, not necessarily heavenly, but demonic rather, for according to 2 Corinthians 11:14, “How Satan too can be transformed as an Angel of Light”, from what Dr. Jorge Matta Torres (below) elicits to. From this communion with Jesus in the spirit, once more, Paul believed that he, himself, knew more and thus was more enlightened, than what the originally-appointed Apostles could ever gain from the true-to-life historical Jesus, within the flesh.

According to Jorge Matta Torres, PHD, from The Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences (October 24, 2016), “Paul lived during the first century CE. It has been speculated that Paul’s religious experiences resulted from temporal lobe epilepsy. We would argue that it is not necessary to invoke epilepsy as an explanation for these experiences. Paul’s mood in his letters ranged from ecstatic to tears of sorrow, suggesting marked mood swings. He endorsed an abundance of sublime auditory and visual perceptual experiences (2 Corinthians 12:2–9) that resemble grandiose hallucinations with delusional thought content. He manifested increased religiosity and fears of evil spirits, which resembles paranoia. These features may occur together, in association with primary and mood disorder-associated psychotic conditions.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

“In 2 Corinthians 12:7, Paul relates ‘a thorn was given me in the flesh, a messenger from Satan, to harass me, to keep me from being too elated.’ This thorn has been speculated to be a reference to epilepsy. Other theories have proposed that the thorn was a physical infirmity, the opposition of his fellow Jews, or a harassing demon. We propose that he perceived an apparition or voice that he understood to be a harassing, demonic messenger from Satan. This perception might have afflicted him with some amount of negative commentary of the type characteristic for psychotic conditions, resulting in psychological distress.” ~Jorge Matta Torres, PHD, from The Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences (October 24, 2016) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE


“And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into AN ANGEL OF LIGHT~2 Corinthians 11:14 (KJV)


Version 1: “[Saul] was approaching Damascus, suddenly A LIGHT FROM HEAVEN flashed around him.” ~Acts 9:3 (KJV)

Version 2: “I was traveling to Damascus…A LIGHT FROM HEAVEN, brighter than the sun, shining around me and my companions.” ~Acts 26:12 (KJV)

Version 3: “While I was…approaching Damascus…A GREAT LIGHT FROM HEAVEN suddenly shone about me.” ~Acts 22:6 (KJV)


“How art thou fallen FROM HEAVEN, O LUCIFER, (LIGHT bearer) son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, who didst claim the Gentiles as an inheritance!” ~Isaiah 14:12 (KJV)

“The complexity of Paul’s interactions in his perceptual experiences weighs against a seizure-like activity as the cause, as does the lack of evidence for more common epileptic accompaniments, such as repetitive stereotyped behavioral changes and cognitive symptoms, as previously discussed. Paul does, however, manifest a number of personality characteristics similar to the interictal personality traits described by Geshwind, such as deepened emotions; possibly circumstantial thought; increased concern with philosophical, moral and religious issues; increased writing, often on religious or philosophical themes; and, possibly, hyposexuality (1 Corinthians 7:8–9). These characteristics are controversial as to their specificity for epilepsy, with a preponderance of larger studies not confirming a specific personality type associated with seizure disorders. Similar features may also be present in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. As previously mentioned, productive writing tends to be more strongly associated with mood disorders than psychosis or epilepsy. This is persuasive toward Paul having a mood disorder, rather than schizophrenia or epilepsy.

Paul’s religious conversion on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:1–19, 22:6–13, 26:9–16) is an event understood as marked by the acute onset of blindness. This blindness has been hypothesized to have been postictal in nature or psychogenic. There appears to be a lack of clarity as to whether this was literal visual blindness or metaphorical, since Paul refers to persons outside his immediate belief system as spiritually blind or having their eyes closed to spiritual truth (Acts 28:26; Romans 11:8, 11:10; 2 Corinthians 4: 3–5; Ephesians 1:1. Differences in the three most detailed conversion-experience accounts contribute to this ambiguity. Acts 26:12–18 relates his conversion, during which a vision of Jesus tasks him to spiritually open the eyes of the people to whom he will be sent. In this account, there is no mention of acute-onset visual loss followed by its restoration. The application of the blindness metaphor in Acts 26:12–18 may suggest that Paul’s own loss of vision was equally metaphorical and served as a descriptor of his profound realization of feeling suddenly bereft of spiritual understanding; that is, realizing his eyes to be spiritually closed, before the completion of his conversion to the new religious sect. In such an emotional state, it is speculated that he might have required encouragement and emotional assistance to reach Damascus. Another possibility would be that of blindness due to conversion disorder. The absence of other episodes of visual loss (i.e., lack of event stereotypy), the absence of features often seen with postictal blindness (a generalized seizure, anosognosia for deficit, or a gradual return of vision), the presence of complex, mood-congruent auditory–visual experiences resembling hallucinations, and the possible sudden return of his eyesight with a compassionate touch does not fit well into a readily discernable neurological pattern of vision loss. His perceptual experiences, mood variability, grandiose-like symptoms, increased concerns about religious purity, and paranoia-like symptoms could be viewed as resembling psychotic spectrum illness. Psychiatric diagnoses that might encompass his constellation of experiences and manifestations could include paranoid schizophrenia, psychosis NOS, mood disorder-associated psychosis, or schizoaffective disorder. Paul’s preserved ability to write and organize his thoughts would favor a mood disorder-associated explanation for his religious experiences.” ~Jorge Matta Torres, PHD, from The Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences (October 24, 2016) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE


As mentioned previously, in the first segment of this article, I covered in detail the letter to the church at Ephesus in the Book of Revelation, Jesus said, “And you have tested those who say they are apostles and are not, and have found them liars.” ~Revelation 2:2 NKJV. Several scholars proclaim that this specific Scripture is a reference to the Apostle Paul, proclaiming himself as title to apostleship, hence the reference to “those who say they are apostles and are not”. And from this, Paul’s authenticity as a true Apostle was trialed, tested and was considered so to be indeed a “False Apostle” for which was the conclusive verdict at the assembly at Ephesus.

Another reference to Paul (to forewarn others of the dangers of Paul’s influence) is made by Christ himself, as Yahusha (Jesus) states, “At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. For, false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. See, I have told you ahead of time. So, if anyone tells you, ‘There he is, out in the DESERT and in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here he is, in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it.” ~Mathew 24:23-26

But, what did Paul state when he encountered Jesus Christ in spirit (Yahusha Hamaschiach), so to speak? Well, Paul states adamantly (Acts 9:3-20) that he met Jesus between Demascus and Antioch. Back then, this region between Demascus and Antioch was clearly a DESERT and is purely still a DESERT, ‘till this day. Nothing has changed. It is literally a wilderness desert landscape, from ancient times to this very day. And, according to Christ, we must beware of anyone who proclaims to you that, ‘There he is, out in the DESERT and in the wilderness.’

And if this wasn’t enough, as confirmation for you, as the evidence continues to pile-up against Paul, Yahusha also makes reference indirectly to be especially cautious of Paul, as another fair warning to his Disciples, as the Messiah states, “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are RAVENING WOLVES.” ~Mathew 7:15

Now, pay special attention to “RAVENING WOLVES”. In Romans 11:1, Paul boasts rather blatantly of being a member of the tribe or sect of peoples, an unwarranted group known as the tribe of BENJAMIN, “I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of BENJAMIN.”

And now, obviously, we are to pay very special attention to name of this group, called the BENJAMINS. Then, when we go to Genesis 49:27, the definition of a RAVENING WOLF is this, “BENJAMIN is a RAVENOUS WOLF, in the morning devouring the prey and at evening dividing the spoil.” So (seriously) it’s as if Yahusha was speaking in code in order to prevent the Romans, or perhaps even the Powers-That-May-Be from understanding the communication between the Messiah and His People.



Additionally, if you truly study Paul, his life, and his New Theology of things when it comes to defining the Teachings of the Messiah, you will begin to see that it is not Theology that he is passionately ministering to the gentiles, rather it is an Alchemical New Age Christology, which goes against the Teachings of the historical Yahusha Hamaschiach (Jesus Christ) and the LAW OF GOD! In the modern day era, New Age Pagans call this new systems of thinking in spirituality as Mysticism. As a former Pagan, myself, this mysticism per-say is simply New Age practice and Pagan philosophy, common among the mystery schools of thought. Now, for those of whom have only yet known of the “church” throughout all their lives, have only known of people of church, church pastors, and only of the exclusive church ways of living and in theology, and in nothing else, let alone the teachings taught in secret societies and of the mystical order, such as the case as I (as a former Rosicrucian and New Ager) then one would never be able to discern (as described above) that the philosophy and theology of Paul’s ideology of a pseudo-alchemical New Age Christology of the newly-rendered and/or self-actualized Mindset of Christ is indeed a form of Mysticism, purely pagan at its utmost!

According to Rosa Elias, Social Media Manager of Liberty Champion, “The New Age movement, or New Age spirituality, is a conglomeration of beliefs rooted in Eastern mysticism. Things ranging from meditation to occult practices can all fall under the umbrella of New Ageism. Although it is difficult to define at times, which is why its followers rarely label themselves as such, this unbiblical worldview has permeated America, including the evangelical church.

While nowadays eight-in-ten Christians say they believe in the God of the Bible, six-in-ten believe in one or more of four predominant New Age beliefs, including the belief in psychics, reincarnation and in astrology. Even though some of these can be easily identified as contrary to biblical truth, there are other beliefs within New Age that have subtly trickled into the church. 

Arguably even more dangerous is the self-love and self-actualization ideology that is being fed to many Christians today and accepted as truth. This seems, at first glance, like a belief that could align with biblical Christianity. However, when examined closely, it becomes increasingly easy to see that these claims are actually rooted in New Age beliefs rather than the Christian faith. Although the Bible affirms that every individual has intrinsic value because he or she is made in the image of the Creator, the Bible is also quick to affirm that without God, we are completely depraved.

According to former New Ager, now Christian apologist, Steven Bancarz, Satan is trying to deceive humanity with the lie he started with in Genesis 3: you shall be like God. When entangled by lies of self, we are convinced that life is simply about bettering our character or social standing, and that through affirmation, positive thinking and self-reliance it can be achieved. 

Christians, beware. This is not the Gospel that Jesus calls us to. When we follow Christ, we deny ourselves, take up our crosses and follow him. The life of a Christian is not a life of self-actualization, but rather of complete self-denial. Not because we don’t have value, but rather because there is nothing good in us that we could give value to on our own. Our value comes directly from God alone. Only through Christ and his work of redemption can we become who we were created to be.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

From this, I further looked into the work of Dr. N.T. Wright, Professor of the New Testament and Early Christianity Program, from the University of St. Andrews (Scotland). Dr. Wright described the very theology that Paul desired to transmorph the “Concept of Yahusha” into, and it was that of a category of Mysticism indeed which mimicked in parallel similar vernacular to that of secret societies, case in point “The Rosicrucians”. For many years, as a former New Ager (myself), as previously aforementioned, I was also a practicing Rosicrucian, and the way that Dr. M.T. Wright described Paul’s brand new Christology of the Mind of Christ, I instantly sensed through discernment that it mimicked the very same self-actualization science, methodology, and theology of the Rosicrucians, and it is Luciferian!

The true origin of Rosicrucianism is unknown. Today there are two groups which claim to be representative of Rosicrucianism, the Rosicrucianism Fellowship in Oceanside, Calif., and the rival organization, the Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis (AMORC) in San Jose, Calif. The latter group is adamant about being the faithful Rosicrucianism order. The earliest authentically Rosicrucianism writings come from the 17th century. These anonymous works set forth the travels of the alleged founder of the order, one Christian Rosenkreutz. As the story goes, Rosenkreutz learned secrets about medicine and magic while on a trip to the Near East. Upon his return to Europe, he founded a secret fraternity whose members communicated in secret-coded writings. As is the case with all false religions, Rosicrucianism is a lie from the father of lies, Satan, and as such it has many things in common with other false systems. First, it denies the authority of Scripture. We know from 2 Timothy 3:16 that “All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE


Dr. James Daniel Tabor is a Biblical scholar and Professor of Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, where he has taught since 1989 and served as Chair from 2004–14. According to Dr. James D. Tabor, “Faith in the blood of Jesus is a new idea, not founded upon the Teachings of original Hebraic text – The Tanakh. The very gospels of which Paul was preaching is entirely new. Paul is creating something entirely new, a new Gospel, separate from the Teachings of Yahusha, according to Paul.” (18:2) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

“Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you.” ~Deuteronomy 4:2

“For verily I say unto you, ‘till heaven and earth pass, one jot nor one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” ~Mathew 5:18


Manly Palmer Hall (18 March 1901 – 29 August 1990) was a Rosicrucian, a Canadian author, lecturer, astrologer, and a mystic. Over his 70-year career he gave thousands of lectures, including two at Carnegie Hall and published over 150 volumes, of which the best known is The Secret Teachings of All Ages (1928). CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

According to Manly P. Hall, Sha’ul of Tarsus (Apostle Paul), in all probabilities was an initiate of the Pagan Greek Mystery Schools or one who has been exposed to those of the Pagan Greek Mysteries. And from these influences, he gave a certain experience. Paul tells us that he received a succinct “tapping on the shoulder” so to speak, which most certainly constitutes a means to a certain type of religious order, which was not terrestrial to the very beliefs of his time nor of his surroundings or landscape; but rather of something that had to do with the acceptance to a foreign faith or belief, which deeply-related to a certain set of vows, obligations, prerequisites, and a certain needs.” (2:30) CLICK HERE TO WATCH THIS VIDEO


Once more, Paul never met Jesus, and never was part of the movement, as led by James to spread the true Gospels of Christ. But, Paul taught and preached about three primary points about Yahusha, and they were specifically about the death, burial, and the Resurrection of Christ. Though, the only story for which Paul had shared was that of the “Last Supper”. In Paul’s New Age Christology of the Mind of Christ, Paul spoke relentlessly about the Resurrection of a “New Being”, as ourselves (gentiles) who are to receive Jesus. Paul also believed that he was the first-born of a new species, and none other. After Jesus’ Crucifixion, Paul self-proclaims (once more) that he was chosen by God – transformed into a New Race of its kind, from himself and for himself (MYSTICISM). Paul has stated that he personally received this information, “For my Heavenly Christ told me so.” ~Sha’ul of Tarsus (Paul). To Paul, Yahusha Hamaschiach (Jesus Christ), the Messiah was better off dead, than alive!


According to Rev. Dr. Jeffrey Frantz, “Within this new ‘seeing,’ as Paul perceives it, illumination has come. And with a humble spirit, Paul sees in a new way. This new ‘seeing’ enables the mystic to come to a new “knowing” as well. This “knowing” is very personal and highly intuitive. In the mystic’s experience, they don’t just believe in God; they move from believing in God to ‘knowing’ God.

Mystics have experiences of knowing that evoke none-ordinary states of consciousness. In these experiences, there is an overwhelming sense of knowing God. The experience, the ecstasy, transcends the mystics capacity for explanation. The mystic can only talk abstractly about the experience. He/she can never explain it. It is in the realm of the ineffable–an experience beyond words. The Rev. Dr. Jeffrey Frantz is a retired United Church of Christ minister. He had long term pastorates in San Diego County and in Miami Lakes, Florida. His service as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Panama in the late sixties spurred his commitment to social-justice ministries and to a spirit of ecumenism as a local church pastor. He holds a Doctor of Ministry degree from Pacific School of Religion. He is the author of The Bible of The Bible You Didn’t Know You Could Believe In. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE


As a new Christian, right after I walked away from the New Age Deception, let alone an Orthodox Christian at that (which was very short-lived), I also thought and believed wholeheartedly that the Apostle Paul was one of the original Disciples, as appointed by Yahusha Hamaschiach. But to my surprise he was not. Paul was never even one of the original Disciples, but yet he declared himself a self-proclaimed authority to Christ, when Paul never even met the Messiah! -Although, Paul proclaims, in the Book of Acts, that he himself was called upon by Jesus, in the Spirit, at Demascus.

As from what can be clearly indicated and most apparently evidenced earlier within this article, the Teachings of Paul’s false gospel go against and contradict in REBELLION to the THE LAW OF GOD! But what other entity also goes against the LAW OF GOD? ANSWER: Satan himself! Satan convinced 1/3 of the Angels to rebel against the MOST HIGH! And (guess what) he is doing the same, literally convincing millions and upon millions of Christians all throughout the world to “rebel” against the LAW OF GOD by rebuking Mosaic Law. Once more, Christ never proclaimed to change nor abolish THE LAW, but rather to uphold Mosaic Law – THE LAW OF GOD.

According to Mathew 5:17, Yahusha Hamaschiach (Jesus Christ) states, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets, I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them.”

But Paul adamantly boasts against THE LAW and against the Teachings of the Messiah that we are ought to forget the law through the blood of Jesus Christ! – Just outright Blasphemy! So, with this said, what Jesus Christ are we talking about here?

ANSWER: The Christ of which is being worshipped here and glorified, is not the true Messiah, but rather is an entity Central to the Christian Church – “The False Messiah” (The Anti-Christ). In the Tanakh, Scripture states that Yahusha clearly indicates that He has not come here to abolish nor replace THE LAW… but to fulfill it – to uphold Tanakh – to fulfill Mosaic Law! GOD is not the Father of Confusion, nor contradiction. Though, there is another: Satan, the Father of Lies and Rebellion.

“For REBELLION is as the sin of witchcraft. And stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, He hath also rejected thee from being king.” ~1 Samuel 15:23

The reason why the ways of the world is exactly the way it is today, arises from such absurd thinking and ridiculous theology: “Hey, let’s go and live our lives without any moral code, with no need to abide by any moral set of commandments, and ‘hey’ let’s just abide by our own set of moral standards whether we do right or wrong. But (listen) at the end of the day, everything will be just fine, for we are forgiven! Now, if this were the case, and if Yahusha Hamaschiach allowed for this to be, just imagine how much worse the world would be? It would literally be a free-for-all, where everything goes! It would be absolute chaos! But, always remember, the Most High is not the god of chaos nor confusion. Rather, Our Creator is a God of Order – Law and Order!


Now, in perspective, this doesn’t sound any different from New Age Deceptive Theology. It seriously sounds like REBELLION to me! Honestly, it sounds like the deceptive manipulative devices of HaSatan (Satan) himself!

1. COMMANDMENT #1: No wonder why so many Christians are deceived in calling the MOST HIGH GOD by the pagan name Yahweh, a demigod deity of metallurgy. And in why some religions like Islam practice paganism too as well, when they call their god Allah, who is actually a pagan deity moon god. And then you have others, like Hinduism, for which it’s followers worship thousands and upon thousands of demon entities. Humanity has turned away from God!

2. COMMANDMENT #2: No wonder why People adore and glorify false idols, such as in the case with the Greek Orthodoxy Churches when they worship their false Saint icons. And in why they worship mother Mary more than the Messiah, Goddess Worship, let alone the pagan Holy Trinity – Polytheism!

3. COMMANDMENT #3: No wonder why the world takes the Most High Adonai’s name in vain when they fail to honor the fathers name – his true name – Yahuah and in the true Messiah’s name Yahusha Hamaschiach!

4. COMMANDMENT #4: It’s no wonder why humanity has declined significantly in their relationship with the Most High when they do NOT celebrate the Shabbat on the seventh day. For the 4th commandment States: REMEMBER: Keep the Sabbath day holy!

5. COMMANDMENT #5: No wonder why so many do not honor their father and mother. No wonder why there are so many broken homes without fathers, even so more now throughout societies of the world today!

6. COMMANDMENT #6: No wonder why there is so much murder in the world today!

7. COMMANDMENT #7: No wonder why there is divorce at such an alarming rate within the world today through adultery!

8. COMMANDMENT #8: No wonder why there is so much theft between and among us. Money, lives, wealth, wives, and many other things of value are being stolen from each other now as we speak – EVERYDAY!

9. COMMANDMENT #9: No wonder why we portray false witness to our neighbors – Defamation of Fame is so prolific within our world today!

10. COMMANDMENT #10: No wonder why in the Tenth Commandment that people lust over other people’s belongings… in our world today!


So Christians today adamantly proclaim that the Old Testament (The Old Covenant), thus Mosaic Law (The Law of God)… no longer exists, and it is abolished by the New Covenant?


Once more, the reason why the ways of the world is exactly the way it is today, is because Humanity and Christians alike have been manipulated by HaSatan (Satan) himself to induce REBELLION against the Laws of the Most High Adonai (God). And this is done through the False Spirit (The False Messiah), the Anti-Christ, of whom has manipulated and mind-controlled the Christian Church of the modern day! Thus, if we are not to abide by any moral code, Mosaic Law, so it is perfectly ok to commit adultery, to murder, to state the Lord’s name in vain, to dishonor our parents, and perhaps even to steal? Hey, these are among the Ten Commandments.

Now, I’ve used 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12 before, to make a point about Paul, in making reference, concerning the characteristics of the Antichrist. And of course, Paul does possess many of those characteristics indeed, but the irony of it all, is that Paul wrote the Book of 2 Thessalonians. Paul speaks adamantly about the Antichrist spirit of whom this false spirit REBELS against the Law of God. And from what we have gathered throughout this article, the following list of Scripture clearly paints a picture as to who this Antichrist could be, and it is Paul! Paul declares that this Antichrist that he lies and has deceived us in order to believe in that lie. And from these lies, we are deceived to believe in the delusion. And last but most certainly not least, Paul declares that this Antichrist, this individual of Lawlessness, rebels against the Law of God, but yet Paul does the same as well REBELLION! This is Hypocrisy at its ultimate – the Absolute Abomination of Desolation! Just always remember, when one person points his dirty finger in one direction, there are three other dirty fingers pointing straight back at him:

Galatians 1:8-9

Galatians 2:16

Galatians 3:11

Galatians 3:13

Galatians 5:24

“Don’t let anyone DECEIVE you in any way, for that day will not come until the REBELLION occurs and the man of LAWLESSNESS is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God. Don’t you remember that when I was with you I used to tell you these things? And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be REVEALED at the proper time. For the secret power of LAWLESSNESS is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way. And then the LAWLESS ONE WILL BE REVEALED, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. The coming of the LAWLESS one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the LIE, and all the ways that wickedness DECEIVES those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful DELUSION so that they will believe the LIE and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.” ~2 Thessalonians 2:3-12 NIV


So, in retrospect, those who abide by such ways, such fallacy and deceit, not only are blasphemous and heretical, but simply are merely deceived. And I do say this with utmost humility and compassion for our dear Christian brothers and sisters. Dear Father, please forgive them for they know not what they do…


According to Rabbi Tovia Singer, a prominent and well-renown American Orthodox Rabbi and the founder and director of Outreach Judaism, we know from the historical viewpoint, from the works of Jocephus from what can be described from his Antiquities Book of the Jews, along with Paul’s letters, Paul was not a very liked individual. He had many enemies. He was quite forthright in his approach to many. If Paul didn’t get his way, he was rather threatening. Hey, it was always within his blood. We must never forget about him historically to what he had done to Jews and Christians alike. And if people were not fearful of him, due to his murderous past, there were also others of whom less desired the very foundations of his gospel for which he preached, especially the Jews. Then, there were other portions within the community of his day, who wanted him killed. (50:32) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE


So, with this said, not all of the disciples and their followers had complete faith in his claim, that Paul declared himself an authority as an apostle (evangelist) based on a visionary encounter with Jesus at Demascus. So, from this (alone), as one can assume, there was some suspicion, right off the bat. Additionally, from what was highlighted earlier, Paul also introduced a new idea to the Christian sect, this New Alchemical Mindset of Christ. And most certainly, the average Jew wasn’t going to buy that, let alone any of the Disciples. This was the very reason as to why Paul became the supposed Apostle to the Gentiles. If this new Gospel that he developed were to be pitched to anyone, the best bet was to preach it to the Pagan gentiles of whom didn’t know any better in making comparisons between what to believe and in what not to believe.

This meant that some Gentiles would have to be saved from the wrath of God at the End of Days. So he set about on a mission to convert Gentiles to Christianity without converting them to Judaism, for which he believed had to occur before Jesus would return as the Son of Man. The pillars at the mother church accepted this on the condition that Paul’s Gentile congregations contribute to their fund for the poor in Jerusalem. But James in particular never got fully on board with this. He insisted, for instance, that Jewish Christians not eat with Gentile Christians. For Paul, the denial of table fellowship was abhorrent, since all were equal in Christ. There is widespread confusion about this point, by the way. Many people believe that Paul thought all Christians were not bound by the law, but that is not accurate. He and the disciples agreed that Jews should keep the covenant. The disagreements were over whether or not Gentile Christians should keep the Law and/or to convert to Judaism.

Paul, for example, reported that Peter would eat with his Gentile congregations unless any of James’ followers were present, at which point he would go eat with them separately. But Paul didn’t just think that Gentile Christians shouldn’t convert to Judaism and keep the Law by keeping kosher and (for men) being circumcised. He insisted that they must not do it; Not only because of the scriptural prophecies, but also because it was not the Law that offered salvation. To Paul, it was election by the holy spirit based on faith in Jesus’ resurrection. So for Gentiles, according to Paul, to feel that they had to covert, well, this was a lack of faith in salvation by the blood of Christ alone, and following through with it would cost them their salvation. His battle with the James and the Disciples over that point was quite heated.

According to Mark Coppenger, of Bible Mesh: Trusted Theological Education, “Peter and Paul did have a sharp encounter. And we can see this unfold in Galatians 2:11-19, where Paul rebukes his fellow apostle for caving in to the prejudice of a group who said that people from all ethnic backgrounds had to satisfy the Jewish ritual law before they could become proper Christians. This meant, for instance, that men had to be circumcised and that no one could eat pork. Paul was livid at this perversion of the gospel. They were piling on superfluities, making salvation a matter of performance instead of a gift of mercy and grace on the basis of faith alone. If there’s any doubt over how upset Paul was at this heresy, one should read verse 5:12, where he says, “I wish those who unsettle you would emasculate themselves!” In other words, as long as they have the knife out, why stop with circumcision? They could be even more “holy” if they kept on cutting. In the fire of Paul’s righteous indignation, Peter got scorched. He was doing just fine with the brothers in Antioch – until, that is, some Jewish church members came up from Jerusalem. Before they arrived, he was eating happily with uncircumcised non-Jews in the local fellowship. But when these “legalists,” these Old Testament Law police, showed up, he caved in and pulled away from the Gentiles. Paul spotted his craven behavior and let him have it in front of these judgmental visitors. His rebuke and doctrinal lecture make for great gospel reading.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

According to Wayne Jackson of the Christian Courier, “Saul of Tarsus had been such a vicious persecutor of Christians that even
after his conversion the brethren were still afraid of him. When Paul eventually returned to Jerusalem following his conversion to Christ, Barnabas had to persuade the disciples to let the apostle fellowship with them (Acts 9:26). As a result of this intercession, a wonderful friendship between Paul and Barnabas was formed. It is, therefore, rather sad to note that they eventually had a “falling out” of sorts. On their first missionary journey together, John Mark, the cousin of
Barnabas (Col. 4:10), accompanied them. Along the way, however, John Mark decided to return to his home in Jerusalem (Acts 13:13). The reason for his departure is not specified in the sacred text. Later on, when a second campaign was planned, Barnabas proposed taking Mark as a helper, but Paul resisted the idea. The New Testament record indicates that a “sharp contention” developed between them (Acts 15:36-41).They could not reach an agreement, and so they split up. As far as the sacred record indicates, these two remarkable men never saw one another again.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE


Although, many Christian supporters will often use 2 Peter 3:14-16 as an attempt to debunk my argument that Paul was not well-liked by the Disciples. They frequently use this piece of Scripture to endorse their claim that even Peter supported Paul’s work and judgement of character; Although this is so severely far from the truth. Here is the actual Scripture:

“Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless. And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved BROTHER Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things HARD TO BE UNDERSTOOD, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other SCRIPTURES, unto their own destruction.” ~2 Peter 3:14-16

Here are a few points presented as to why this statement by Peter was, not only a non-endorsement for Paul, but in that this Scripture was modified later altered and added by a scribe, after this version’s original publishing:

1. Peter calls Paul a brother, and not an apostle, which does not provide authority, nor membership to Discipleship

2. Peter makes quite a witty but stabbing statement against Paul, when Peter writes a critical commentary, in which Paul’s writings are rather difficult to understand

3. This piece of Scripture also flows in such a way, without mentioning Paul

4. Within this Scripture, the intention is unclear, thus God is not a God of confusion. God would not have inspired confusion within this text

5. The word scripture was utilized within this text. In making a quite pertinent statement here, an active writer during those times would never make mention of their current active writings, as being “Scripture”. Scripture only pertains to writers of whom have already passed away – NEVER!

6. Paul Never wrote about the Patience of the Lord, so that more people can be saved; Not in Paul’s letters. Rather, Paul writes the opposite…

In summary, Paul was a very difficult man to get along with. Paul disconnected ties with Barnabas, de-friended him! Paul got into verbal bouts with James. And Paul also had numerous verbal arguments with Peter, which was very much apparent, as their scuffle of words (a well-publicized encounter) was clearly documented in Galatians 2:11–14. The incident at Antioch was a Biblically well-reknown dispute between Paul and Peter, which occurred within that city around the middle of the first century. But, sadly enough to say, bouts of dispute were not only exclusive to Peter and Paul. The most sadistic of disputes, was that between Paul and James, which would regrettably lead to possibly the murder of James, under the hand of Paul – THE STONING OF JAMES!


Now, if only I could ever take credit for this absolutely amazing discovery, this quite compelling find (for which I speak of) would parallel the very manuscript pages found behind-the-scenes for the Blockbuster hit movie – Davinci Code. So, ladies and gentlemen, I will not take the credit. For this, I will proudly give a wonderful kudos to former Protestant pastor, prolific researcher, and the author of his ground-breaking work, entitled Apostle Paul Antichrist. According to Jeffrey Daugherty, he proclaims that, not only is the false apostle Paul, a heretic, a liar, and a blasphemer, but Paul is also the murderer of James, a true Disciple, and the half-brother of Yahusha Hamaschiach. And (yes) you heard me right, the Apostle James’ murderer! Daugherty, in many ways is an exhibitionist at heart, although entertaining whereby skeptics may receive his discoveries rather lightly because of its delivery, but regardless, Daugherty still quite intuitively pulls-out subject matters (Scripturally-based) of which continues to open doors well-worthy to consideration for further investigation. Daugherty is not alone, within this conviction, as he shares the same conclusions, such as prolific Biblical scholars and researchers Robert Eisenman, Dean Larson, and Dr. Robert M. price as they also share parallel conclusions which proves threatening to the legitimacy of Paul and the validity of the Christian Church. And now, we are here to examine one of those doorways of investigation as we graze upon the possibility that Paul murdered James, the half-brother of Christ. Was the curious death of Stephen really a fictional rewrite of Paul killing James the brother of Jesus? For starters, the evidence can be first examined within Scripture, more specifically within the following passage, Acts 7:54-60:

“When the members of the Sanhedrin heard this, they were furious and gnashed their teeth at him. But Stephen, full of the Holy Spirit, looked up to heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. ‘Look,’ he said, ‘I see heaven open and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.’ At this they covered their ears and, yelling at the top of their voices, they all rushed at him, dragged him out of the city and began to stone him. Meanwhile, the witnesses laid their coats at the feet of a young man named ‘SAUL’. While they were stoning him, Stephen prayed, ‘Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.’ Then he fell on his knees and cried out, ‘Lord, do not hold this sin against them.’ And when he had said this, he fell asleep.” ~Acts 7:54-60

Josephus ben Mattathias (37 to 100 CE) was born in Jerusalem to a priestly and royal family. He was a Pharisee. He traveled to Rome in 62 CE to free some imprisoned priests which he successfully accomplished by having Nero’s wife, Poppaea, intercede on his behalf. He returned to Jerusalem in 65 CE -finding that his people had risen up in a revolt against Rome. He soon found himself caught up in the revolt and was taken prisoner by Vespasian’s Roman forces. Josephus joined the Roman side, was branded a traitor the rest of his life, and had to watch them destroy the second Temple and massacre his people. He is the Jewish historian of his time, if not of all time. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

Flavius Josephus, author of The Antiquities of the Jews, wrote specifically about the Stoning of James (Book 20, Chapter 9). And coincidentally enough, his depiction exactly mirrors what was accounted for within Scripture from what was highlighted above in Acts 7:54-60, as depicted by Luke; except Luke covered it up and renamed James to Stephen, who is exactly depicted within this Scripture, in relationship to Flavius Josephus’ account. For those who are not Bible readers, Luke is the author of The Book of Acts in the Bible. Now, this was done in particular (by Luke) so as to document this event (The Stoning of Stephen) in code, to implement Stephen whether he was a fictional character or not as a representation for the true central historical figure of whom was stoned instead, of whom was actually James the Just. This was done during those times to document in code, so as to prevent their writings from being deleted from the original canon, as Roman scribes were often utilized (of course) to review, edit and even modify if need be certain content of which did not abide by what was delineated as the standard, by Roman influence.

According to Researcher Oded Ir-Shai, in his article “The Jerusalem Church – From a Church of the Circumcised to a Church of Goyim”, Oded Ir-Shai analyzes the few sources that mentions James and the period for which he lived, along with his murder, as he makes reference to Jocephus, from his “Antiquities Book” (Book 20, Chapter 9), concerning the “Stoning of James” with the following description:

“And now Caesar, upon hearing the death of Festus, sent Albinus into Judea, as procurator. But the king deprived Joseph of the high priesthood, and bestowed the succession to that dignity on the son of Ananus, who was also himself called Ananus. Now the report goes that this eldest Ananus proved a most fortunate man; for he had five sons who had all performed the office of a high priest to God, and who had himself enjoyed that dignity a long time formerly, which had never happened to any other of our high priests. But this younger Ananus, who, as we have told you already, took the high priesthood, was a bold man in his temper, and very insolent; he was also of the sect of the Sadducees, who are very rigid in judging offenders, above all the rest of the Jews, as we have already observed; when, therefore, Ananus was of this disposition, he thought he had now a proper opportunity (to kill James and some of the others no doubt – if this is read in context). Festus was now dead, and Albinus was but upon the road; so he assembled the Sanhedrin (note this) of judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, (by Saul’s / Paul’s Christians only) whose name was James, and some others;(others who did not stray from Jesus’ flock to become Christians) and when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, (Jesus came to set his people free spiritually, but also physically from the non-biblical laws that held his people captive to the corrupt, litigious Sadducees and Pharisees – the Sanhedrin) he delivered them to be stoned: but as for those who seemed the most equitable of the citizens, and such as were the most uneasy at the breach of the laws, they disliked what was done; they also sent to the king [Agrippa], desiring him to send to Ananus that he should act so no more, for that what he had already done was not to be justified; nay, some of them went also to meet Albinus, as he was upon his journey from Alexandria, and informed him that it was not lawful for Ananus to assemble a Sanhedrin without his consent. Whereupon Albinus complied with what they said, and wrote in anger to Ananus, and threatened that he would bring him to punishment for what he had done; on which king Agrippa took the high priesthood from him, when he had ruled but three months, and made Jesus, (a different Jesus, of course) the son of Damneus, high priest.” CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE


According to Jeffrey Daugherty, whom was introduced to you earlier in this segment, and for whom he was also referenced throughout this article, he’s states, “Obviously, Luke (in the book of Acts) is directing our attention to this situation in Biblical Scripture, the Stoning of Steven. He uses it, this passage, as a literary device to show us that Acts 7 is a word-for-word, blow-by-blow description of the stoning of the Apostle James. He then closes the account by ‘laying it all at the feet of Saul’ showing in no uncertain terms that Paul killed James–and that to be long after his Damascus road ‘conversion’.” (1:45:32) PLEASE CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

Could the actual Biblical Account of “The Stoning of Stephen” whereby the Apostle Paul was responsible for that murder, along with the historical account as recorded by Josephus Flavius (concerning the “Stoning of James”)… be parallels for which Paul is also connected to that murder too as well? Well, according to several Biblical Scholars, as portrayed within the documentary The Origins of Christianity: The Piso-Flavian Dynasty, this could verily be the case, which is very damning against Apostle Paul’s camp on the defensive side of things. Paul is essentially the very foundation for, not only the entire Church today, as we speak, but also the very root foundation for The New Testament! This is where the ultimate form of Heresy comes into play! Just as a side note, the creation of The New Testament was funded by a very wealthy family, the Alexanders, for which they were also well-connected with the Herods (a highly-influential and a very political family related to the infamous King Herod). During that era, during the Flavian Dynasty, the Flavian writing team often utilized Hebraic Typology in order to parallel Biblical events with actual historical events, with a twist! Hebraic Typology beholds multi-layers of meanings whereby the text, context and pretext are intertwined made specific for the eyes of whom are able to see. Historically, throughout all of Hebraic literature, Typology is utilized. And in this case, Luke (who wrote the Book of Acts) substituted James with Stephen, a fictional character in order to encode the truth in relationship to historical writings of Josephus from within the very pages of his Antiquities Book for the Jews. And this was most significantly a well-known signature trait of the Flavian Family and its writing team. Essentially, the Flavians adopted this ancient Hebraic literary technique to incorporate as their branding. (54:45) CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SOURCE

According to scholars, there are over 40 instances within “The Old and New Testament”, for which examples of Hebraic Typology are quite foreseeable and most certainly evident within the biblical text. Such examples of Typology which were already referenced within this article are the following:

1. When Yahusha Hamaschiach (Jesus Christ) forwarned his Disciples of Wolves in Sheeps Clothing, calling themselves Ravenous Wolves, in Mathew 7:15. Paul blatantly boasts about being a part of the Tribe of Benjamin, in Romans 11:1. Then, the definition of Benjamin is equated to Ravenous Wolves, in Genesis 49:27, which furthermore implicates Paul as being the very individual of whom Jesus was first warming people about from the very get-go

2. When Yahusha (once more) warned his Disciples to be leery about anyone of whom foretells that the Messiah would meet them in the desert, Mathew 24:23-26; And then there you have Paul boasting, Acts 9:3-20, about the fact that he had met Jesus between Antioch and Demascus, which is clearly a desert.

3. And another example of Hebraic Typology is used when Paul forewarns of the Antichrist within 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12. In this Scripture, he defines this Antichrist as the Lawless One and in one who deceives the masses through this delusion. Well, although clearly another form of Typology, but this could verily be another typical Pauline Trait of Hypocrisy

Now, could this verily be the proverbial last nail, nailed into the coffin? I have presented the information for you, from all angles, from the historical, the mystical, the New Age, Pagan, the Christian Orthodoxy point of view, the psychiatric, and the Scriptural, among many other perspectives, but to take things seriously, the evidence against Paul is overwhelming!

CONCLUSION: “The premise of this article is to conclude that the Church has veered far from the true teachings and Hebrew concepts of the Bible, from where it all began. Christianity has been indoctrinated with the culture and beliefs of Greek and Roman philosophy and ultimately with your modern-day biblical Christianity, taught in churches at the very present. The Church has been corrupted with a pagan imitation of the New Testament gospels, essentially an extreme Hellenized version far from the original Hebraic text. As we must always hold True with Biblical Scripture, as our Moral Code of Righteousness, we must never add onto nor takeaway from it, The Law of God. Christ’s death on the cross did not end the Mosaic Covenant, but instead renewed it, expanded its message, and had written that very message within the hearts and minds of its true followers, the Qodeshim. Thus, the true followers of the Most High Adonai teach that the understanding of the New Testament can only come from the origins of a Hebrew perspective and that the teachings of the Apostle Paul are that of a different gospel and spirit, not from that of the true Messiah, Yahusha Hamaschiach. And of course, this is not taught by Christian pastors today. This becomes a subtle threat to the reliability of the text with our Bible, specifically of the New Testament. If the Greek text is unreliable and has been corrupted, for which the evidence is steadily piling-up with profound increase, the Church no longer has a standard of truth. Yahusha Hamaschiach’s sacrifice and resurrection makes our eternal lives possible. He came in the flesh in the form of Man to reveal to humanity Our Dear Father, the Most High Adonai. Elohim is a personal Being of Supreme Love who wants you to be part of His family for all of eternity! This is all about relationship. It is of the utmost importance to study the entire Bible, from the Tanakh (The Old Testament) to the New Testament. Regardless of the implications of Paul’s writings, it is the entire storyline within the New Testament conversional text for which we must know of, study and pray upon. We must be conscious to the fact that we are required to believe the entire Bible which represents God’s full message to humanity. All Scripture—both Old and New Testaments—is very important (2 Timothy 3:16), and that the Word of God is living and is the authoritative code to live by, as accordingly so by the Natsarim (The Set Apart) – The Way!” ~Ayala Nunez

From this, I pray…

“Most High Adonai, please enlighten the darkness of our hearts, to give us the right faith and hope, in charity, wisdom, understanding, and discernment; in as so much, Dear Father, that I may carry out Your Holy and True Command, in the name of the True Messiah, Yahusha Hamaschiach. Shalom” ~Ayala Nunez


ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Ayala Nunez is a former New Age writer and producer, bringing awareness to his story on how he experienced and encompassed the bulk of variable manipulative spiritual practices, theologies, concepts and influences, within the world of the New Age, in search for “Truth”. But, along that darkened journey, he later encountered “Revelation”, once he began to walk away from this elusive and deceptive mind-control trap! He discovered, not only the path to “The Way” on his homecoming voyage back to the True Messiah, Yahushua Hamashiach, but he also uncovered the root beginnings of paganism (Ancient Babylonia) implanted deeply throughout many institutional spiritualities of the world, the very same root foundation of proverbial New Age Theosophy. From this, he soon realized that the true pandemic of our times is none the viral, from what it may seem on the surface, but rather it is something which contributes more to that of a parasitic conundrum. And because of this, his investigative journalism has led him hot-on-the-trail to that very mystery, from whence this parasitic infestation had originally infiltrated the Story of Humanity, since the Garden. Ayala has evolved from New Age influencer… to prolific Christian and Hebrew Bible Researcher… and to now a “Revealer of Truths”. Ayala Nunez is the creator of his viral network blog, called “Walk Away From the New Age”, and is the host of his paradigm-shattering “Set-Apart” influenced podcast, called Quintessential Mark Radio 2.0 (QMR 2.0): The New Age Recovery Chronicles. Additionally, Ayala is the Executive Producer and Founder of R3TV MINISTRIES LLC: The Rise of the Qodeshim – The Number #1 Source for True-to-Life Investigative Journalism, Mental Health and Wellness, and True “Scripture-Based” Broadcast On-Demand…




DISCLAIMER: “Always remember, when one adds to and perhaps even takes away from the Tanakh, as true followers of Adonai (the Remnant abound), we must persistently question with gifted discernment the deceptive doctrines for which false apostles preach (Deuteronomy 4:2). Thus, this podcast, blog, and/or social media post is not meant to portray any notion of condemnation towards any-one-soul, institution, or group in particular, but rather possesses the sincere intention with humility to share my own testimony from what I’ve encountered in Revelation through the Grace of our Dear Father (The Most High Adonai), our Father as the Savior (Yahushua Hamaschiach), and our Father as the Unseen Wind (The Ruach Ha’Qodesh), as One and none the separate (Deuteronomy 6:4). And, thus, this rather revealing discovery (from amongst many others) essentially explains the foundations of what lies behind the very nature of what elusively ravages this earthly human domain: ‘Divoc’ Subtlety in Deception! As once a former New Age influencer, I have experienced for myself the several ways in how vulnerable seekers of truth can be so easily led astray from the mark to salvation, to the path of that authentic and legitimate Truth. Thus, the main aim of this post lies upon, not only placing righteous judgement upon questionable and manipulative practices (John 7:24, ESV), but in also exposing the nefarious agenda of the fallen ones and the elusive demon, from amidst its own venomous hierarchy. In helping to assist us to disengage from human parasitic deliverance, the creation of this post is done intentionally for the sake and sincerity of producing righteously-influenced outcomes, under the guidance of the Spirit of our Dear Father, in obedience. And when we (the select apart) are to do so, to uphold and honor Our Father’s Name, with such endearing and unrelenting praise, we free ourselves absolutely from any principality, deeply founded upon its own wickedness. From this, such forces of necromancy, whom endorse the fallacy of elusive doctrine and ideology, shall not sustain dominion over the Power, Glory and Grace of the Most High Adonai, whom solely vindicates that proper Authority! This is done in loyalty with utmost faith for the Glory of our Almighty Creator – the One and Only True Elohim. Dear Father, please do not forsake us, but forgive us and deliver us from all worldly deceit. We, the Watchmen, are repentant, loyal, and obedient to Your Name – YAHUAH IS ONE!” ~Ayala Nunez, Executive Producer and Founder of R3TV MINISTRIES LLC

NOTE: Based in the high desert from amidst the uncontested beauty within the Valley of Phoenix (Arizona), R3TV Ministries LLC is a podcast video network, an online fellowship, created to provide the Good News to the world – The Glory of Our Dear Father (The Most High Adonai), the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. And as this online presence continues, through time-tested Testimony, to open the eyes of so many, whom have been lost to the ways of the world through the New Age and other ancient pagan influences, this faith-based ministry’s all-encompassing mission lies upon spreading indeed the Moral Code of Righteousness derived from the roots of the vine of original Mosaic Law (The Tanakh) – The True Living Word of the Most High, to all whom seek “His Name.” From within Providence, what the select “set apart” shall see will, not only be the manipulative mind control of Ancient Babylonia, which still has infiltrated all walks of life on earth today, but there is still another Truth, which is revealed to the Remnant. This Revelation lies within it, the responsibility of the End Times Qodeshim (The Natsarim) to honor, protect, creatively minister, and uphold original sacred “Hebraic” Text.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s